doesn't look like the 80 column rule is mentioned in
style(9). this diff puts the sentence around the same place
as osx's style(9) as it was the only example i could find
and it seems like a reasonable place.
Index: style.9
===
RCS fi
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 20:16, Ted Unangst wrote:
> This diff is mechanical in nature. Later I will fix the bugs it reveals:
>
> - while ((status = load_env(envstr, file)) >= OK) {
> + while ((status = load_env(envstr, file)) >= 0) {
> switch (status) {
> - case ERR:
> +
I think you mean 0
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
> OK
>
>
--
Rick Ballard
Dartmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
> On 23 Jan 2015, at 06:52, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2015/01/22 10:09, David Gwynne wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 Jan 2015, at 23:49, Brad Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/21/15 06:51, Jim Smith wrote:
hi all,
the below diff enables support for jumbo frames on
some newer re(4) devi
OK
remove the OK and ERR macros. They obfuscate the code and don't
help legibility. (unix system calls use 0 for ok, but hundreds of
other projects use 1 to indicate success.) Despite the name, many
system calls (e.g., open) also return not OK values for success.
It also cleans up some weird code lik
Hello,
Based on a patch[1] found on the mailing list, I added a link between
dhcpd and unbound to be able to resolve name of all client that have
a lease on dhcpd. And I found a bug in the function 'periodic_scan'
which is called every X second (X = half of the minimum lease duration).
This funct
On 2015/01/22 10:09, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> > On 21 Jan 2015, at 23:49, Brad Smith wrote:
> >
> > On 01/21/15 06:51, Jim Smith wrote:
> >> hi all,
> >>
> >> the below diff enables support for jumbo frames on
> >> some newer re(4) devices. i've tested it on 8186D/8111D
> >> and 8186E/8111E chip
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:01:55 -0500, Martin Brandenburg wrote:
> This makes mail(1) reject -r when not sending a message as it already
> does for -s, -c, and -b.
Thanks, committed.
- todd
