Here are some bcopy calls in kern that could be memcpy.
I also have an older diff for the uipc files, let me dust it off and
review, then I'll resend that too.
Index: exec_subr.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/exec_subr.c,v
retrievi
On Dec 4, 2014, at 4:30 PM, David Higgs wrote:
> I am trying to figure out how to handle the buggy USB firmware in my UPS (see
> misc@ thread from last week). With some kernel debug enabled, I see
> "usb_transfer_complete: short transfer 3<5" messages. Since the
> BatteryPresent sensor could
* Jonathan Gray [2014-12-05 10:16:41]:
> Perhaps a driver name change to reflect that this is to interface to the
> fpga on the soekris?
This is tcpcib(4) all over again ;-)
NetBSD committed this driver as soekrisgpio but I thought that might be a
bit too long. Any opinions or suggestions?
> I
Perhaps a driver name change to reflect that this is to interface to the
fpga on the soekris?
I wonder if the "16 bit general purpose I/O, 26 pins header, connected
to FPGA" on the net6801 will have the same interface.
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:05:46AM -0500, Matt Dainty wrote:
> Anyone?
Anyone?
* Matt Dainty [2014-11-21 07:10:24]:
> * Dimitri Sokolyuk [2014-11-05 22:05:26]:
> >
> > I would also like to ask, if there are any plans on reviewing and
> > committing this code into base?
>
> Here's an updated patch with the driver and associated man page changes
> against -current
On 12/05/14 13:08, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:24 +0100, Gabriel Linder wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On a 5.6-release I have an ix card which refuses to work with unsupported
>> SFP+ modules, saying this : ix0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82599" rev
>> 0x01Unsupported SFP+ Module
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:24 +0100, Gabriel Linder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a 5.6-release I have an ix card which refuses to work with unsupported
> SFP+ modules, saying this : ix0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82599" rev
> 0x01Unsupported SFP+ Module.
>
> However, this seems to be an artificial
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:24:30AM +0100, Gabriel Linder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a 5.6-release I have an ix card which refuses to work with unsupported
> SFP+ modules, saying this : ix0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82599" rev
> 0x01Unsupported SFP+ Module.
>
> However, this seems to be an artifi
Hi,
On a 5.6-release I have an ix card which refuses to work with unsupported SFP+
modules, saying this : ix0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82599" rev
0x01Unsupported SFP+ Module.
However, this seems to be an artificial limitation of the ix driver : the
following diff (against sys.tar.gz as
