On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:34:54AM -0400, thev...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> with SUDO set in /etc/mk.conf:
> if make release is run as root it will not proceed.
> if run as a regular user it gets further, but fails on permissions.
>
> without SUDO in /etc/mk.conf (and i presume the environment)
with SUDO set in /etc/mk.conf:
if make release is run as root it will not proceed.
if run as a regular user it gets further, but fails on permissions.
without SUDO in /etc/mk.conf (and i presume the environment) it works fine.
is there any way around this allowing /etc/mk.conf (which is usefu
Hi,
I hope this is the right list. If it is the wrong list I'd welcome a
hint to the correct list.
Some suggestions for the ressl API:
* Please consider making ressl_config_set_protocols accepting a string
as option instead.
Using constants for protocols like OpenSSL does make it much harder
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 07:28:40PM -0500, Brent Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 16:07, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > I think the first piece is of course the necessary build files. Access
> > to Windows machines is
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:12:02AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 15:16, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This is my attempt to add libc wrappers for mkfifo() and
> > mkfifoat() using mknodat().
>
> Is there a reason? This would seem to do nothing except co
>On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 15:16, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> This is my attempt to add libc wrappers for mkfifo() and
>> mkfifoat() using mknodat().
>
>Is there a reason? This would seem to do nothing except complicate the
>interpretation of ktrace.
Exactly. We have steered c
I'm not convinced we actually want to do this, but your wrapper is
missing something like this:
mode &= ~ACCESSPERMS;
- todd
* Andres Perera [2014-10-23 17:14]:
> [What I'm pointing out below looks like a mistake regardless of the
> variables in scope.]
> > void
> > +addaf(const char *vname, int value)
> > +{
>
> ^ *v*name
>
> > + struct if_afreq ifar;
> > +
> > + strlcpy(ifar.ifar_name, name, sizeof(ifa
[What I'm pointing out below looks like a mistake regardless of the
variables in scope.]
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> * Chris Cappuccio [2014-10-22 01:11]:
>> Stuart Henderson [st...@openbsd.org] wrote:
>> > Any comments on the diff in this?
>> >
>> > > +#ifdef INET6
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 15:16, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is my attempt to add libc wrappers for mkfifo() and
> mkfifoat() using mknodat().
Is there a reason? This would seem to do nothing except complicate the
interpretation of ktrace.
Hi everyone,
This is my attempt to add libc wrappers for mkfifo() and
mkfifoat() using mknodat().
Do I need to do anything else? Should the manpage for mkfifo(2)
and mkfifoat(2) be moved to section 3?
Cheers,
Dimitris
===
RCS file
Hi,
I created a patch for CVE-2014-4330 in Data::Dumper, Version 2.145.
Derived from
http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/19be3be6968e2337bcdfe480693fff795ecd1304
See below.
Regards,
Max Pascher
--- gnu/usr.bin/perl/MANIFEST.orig Tue Sep 30 08:51:52 2014
+++ gnu/usr.bin/perl/MAN
12 matches
Mail list logo