On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Frank Brodbeck wrote:
> today I stumbled upon a script (testssl.sh) which utilizes the \c escape
> sequence for printf(1). As we are missing that escape sequence and - if
> I am not mistaken - it is defined by POSIX (IEEE Std 1003.1) I thought I
> give it a shot.
* Chris Cappuccio [2014-10-22 01:11]:
> Stuart Henderson [st...@openbsd.org] wrote:
> > Any comments on the diff in this?
> >
> > > +#ifdef INET6
> > > + sc->sc_sppp.pp_if.if_xflags &= ~IFXF_NOINET6;
> > > +#endif
> Aside from what Stefan said, isn't this flag going to be removed
> in favor of a
Hi,
today I stumbled upon a script (testssl.sh) which utilizes the \c escape
sequence for printf(1). As we are missing that escape sequence and - if
I am not mistaken - it is defined by POSIX (IEEE Std 1003.1) I thought I
give it a shot.
Please bare with me as I am not an experienced coder or POS
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> Minor nit:
> I have noticed some removals of SSLv3 mentioned on line but the LibreSSL
> stanza of 56.html
> only has SSLv2 noted as No support..
SSLv3 was only disabled by default in LibreSSL within the last week or
so. OpenBSD 5.6 was "c
Minor nit:
I have noticed some removals of SSLv3 mentioned on line but the LibreSSL stanza
of 56.html
only has SSLv2 noted as No support..
*** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I subscribed to the list.
Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is
tarpitted. The reply-t
Stuart Henderson [st...@openbsd.org] wrote:
> Any comments on the diff in this?
>
> > +#ifdef INET6
> > + sc->sc_sppp.pp_if.if_xflags &= ~IFXF_NOINET6;
> > +#endif
Aside from what Stefan said, isn't this flag going to be removed
in favor of a flag that explicitly enables INET6 for interfaces?
Hi,
i'm slowly working towards removing support for the networks(5)
database because networks(5) is broken by design. Nowadays, the
only meaningful way to translate names to numbers and vice versa
is via DNS. However, the networks(5) database isn't integrated
with DNS in any way, even less so th
This patch disables the SSLv3 protocol for the forthcoming 5.6 release.
untrusted comment: signature from openbsd 5.6 base private key
RWR0EANmo9nqhqNRnZqpfGyXZORy+gN++chhlgejO0bmLmp81bJL1+Dhl3iP0bL1NnRopcGECX4QoUbsCCcnMOxkXAYeMYkmMgw=
OpenBSD 5.6 errata 5, Oct 20, 2014
This patch disables the S