On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 July 2014 23:53:21, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
...
> > If we're serious about supporting OpenBSD on (KVM) hypervisors,
> > something like this makes sense. We tend to try and have a single
> > kernel that runs on the widest rang
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Alex Holst wrote:
> Shouldn't /etc/rc check for executable bits in these two cases?
>
My inclination is to say "no". If files in /sbin are present but not
executable, I think I *want* some sort of warning about that instead of
silently skipping their uses.
You
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 02:13:55PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> In case someone is bored (heh) and looking for a user land bug to fix...
>
> Given this:
>printf '1\n2' >a
>printf '1\n2\n3' >b
>
> Compare the output of
>diff -u a b
>
> with the output of
>diff -uw a b
>
> The
+1 , this makes more sense than trying to assume the lifetime of passed
pointers.
Though I usually try writing a string_set helper to avoid too much
boilerplate when there are lots of parameters.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> This diff is incomplete, but shows the dire
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 08:31:15PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Justus Baumgartner
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Philip Guenther
> > wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > That phrasing seems wrong: the environment pointer in execvpe() doesn't
> > > fo
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 02:56:25PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
Ping?
> Hi tech,
>
> during my search after other xfree() implementations, I saw that xfree() in
> sndiod is just a wrapper for free()
> without any other conditions, like NULL check.
>
> fritjof
>
>
> Index: abuf.c
>
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:19:19PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
Ping?
> Hi tech,
>
> remove the atoi calls, in order to avoid overflows.
>
> fritjof
>
>
> Index: rcstime.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rcs/rcstime.c,v
> re
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 10:35:43PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
Ping?
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 08:03:58AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Half true. :)
> >
> > The behavior is intended. I don't really know why they care about
> > freeing null, but the intention is clearly to check for it; other
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:23:00PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
Ping?
> Hi tech,
>
> there is an unnecessary typecast in xmalloc.c of rcs.
>
> fritjof
>
>
> Index: xmalloc.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rcs/xmalloc.c,v
>
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 06:00:45PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
Ping?
> Hi tech,
>
> the OpenRCS rcs command produces the following output if -l and -u is used in
> the
> same command:
>
> $ rcs -l1.1 -u1.1 foo.txt
> RCS file: foo.txt,v
> 1.1 locked
> 1.1 unlocked
>
> $ rcs -u1.1 -l1.1 foo
10 matches
Mail list logo