On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:44:30AM -0400, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
> The C standard mandates that static be first.
Of course I forgot something... This is the hunk that made me
notice in the first place. Found while porting signify to osx.
Index: lib/libc/hash/sha2.c
It's also here :)
8<--
untrusted comment: LibreSSL Portable public key
RWQg/nutTVqCUVUw8OhyHt9n51IC8mdQRd1b93dOyVrwtIXmMI+dtGFe
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
>
> Once we are back in North America where we can do it (the master signature
> box is airgapped) in case you're
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 10:36:25PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> According to the "Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
> Developer's Manual", CPUID.8001H:EDX.Page1GB [bit 26] indicates
> whether 1-GByte pages are supported with IA-32e paging.
>
> I think the diff below adds support for
Something I forgot about during the discussion about the diff for dump:
The manpage doesn't mention yet that we can specify the duid on the
command line now.
--- sbin/dump/dump.8.orig Mon Jul 14 23:57:37 2014
+++ sbin/dump/dump.8Mon Jul 14 23:59:09 2014
@@ -288,8 +288,10 @@
is either a
Hey Ted,
I should have been more clear in my previous email, but would it be
possible
to also revert OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER back to 0x1000107fL (or
0x1000108fL)?
This way LibreSSL would work as a drop-in replacement without
applications
needing to add explicit support for LibreSSL.
Ideas ar
2014-07-14 21:30 GMT+02:00 Jan Engelhardt :
> On Monday 2014-07-14 20:34, Bob Beck wrote:
>
>>What problem are you trying to solve here.
>
>>> Pristine libtool does not pass -m 644, and default (GNU) install
>>> defaults to mode 755 when not specifying anything else.
>
> I am trying to figure out w
On Monday 2014-07-14 20:34, Bob Beck wrote:
>What problem are you trying to solve here.
>> Pristine libtool does not pass -m 644, and default (GNU) install
>> defaults to mode 755 when not specifying anything else.
I am trying to figure out why OpenBSD would be patching libtool
and adding
+
To answer a number of questions about this all at once. No. we don't sign
releases with GnuPG or OpenPGP.
GnuPG alone is a compressed tarball of 4.2 MB of code I have occasionally
had to glance at. I do not have enough
energy in my life to clean up two poorly written crypto code bases. The
world
If you look at the diff that went in already, it's using mallocarray.
It wouldn't even compile otherwise.
What problem are you trying to solve here.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Monday 2014-07-14 20:16, Toni Mueller wrote:
>>Hi Jan,
>>
>>On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> On Sunday 2014-07-13 13:07, Bob Beck wrote:
>>> >We have releas
On Monday 2014-07-14 20:16, Toni Mueller wrote:
>Hi Jan,
>
>On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Sunday 2014-07-13 13:07, Bob Beck wrote:
>> >We have released an update, LibreSSL 2.0.1
>> >As noted before, we welcome feedback from the broader community.
>>
>> Some
>Ted Unangst tedunangst.com> writes:
>
>> Any system that actually uses egd is so hopelessly broken you
>> are better off just turning around and walking away. No software in
>> 2014 should be using egd; no software in 2014 should support using egd
>> by accident.
>
>This is wrong. The egd protoco
Hi Jan,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Sunday 2014-07-13 13:07, Bob Beck wrote:
> >We have released an update, LibreSSL 2.0.1
> >As noted before, we welcome feedback from the broader community.
>
> Something that I have noticed is that the shared libraries
Sorry to break the threading, but I already expunged the original
message..
Re: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=140529530814733&w=2
The second and third hunk should use mallocarray() instead of malloc()
in my eyes.
sizeof(Elf_Phdr) as type just doesnt make sense to me.
Hope not "everyone"
The C standard mandates that static be first.
>From ISO/IEC 9899:1999 and 9899:201x,
6.11.5 - Storage-class specifiers:
The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the
beginning of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is
an obsolescent feature.
and -Wextra complain
Ted Unangst tedunangst.com> writes:
> Any system that actually uses egd is so hopelessly broken you
> are better off just turning around and walking away. No software in
> 2014 should be using egd; no software in 2014 should support using egd
> by accident.
This is wrong. The egd protocol is acc
Hi hanno, we've been discussing it extensively here. It's been out
and back in and out and back in ;)
the problem is there are multiple pieces of software, all of which
test for this stuff rather badly. and either
way we do it seems to break things.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Hanno Böck w
Hello,
I recently tried to rebuild a complete gentoo system with libressl, if
you haven't seen, I've blogged about it:
https://blog.hboeck.de/archives/851-LibreSSL-on-Gentoo.html
One of the issues that popped up was in dovecot. Compilation failed due
to missing constants of the compression funct
On 07/14/14 09:42, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Gustav Fransson Nyvell
mailto:gus...@nyvell.se>> wrote:
I'm looking at 5.5-current. I'm forking inside a lib and I want to
change the forks cmd or argv[0]. I mean, what you see as "command"
in ps or top. I've
> Anyway, I still like the idea, but I wonder if now right after the
> hackathon is the right time. But please continue experimenting with
> this during my vacation ;-) Changing the error message would be a good
> thing, to distinguish the various calls to munmap.
Timing is bad. We need to fix t
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:10:38PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 08:11, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> >> I also think there's one simple case that can be added: the MMAP call
> >> at the bottom of map().
>
> On further inspection, I think this needed a slight reordering to be
> sa
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Gustav Fransson Nyvell
wrote:
> I'm looking at 5.5-current. I'm forking inside a lib and I want to change
> the forks cmd or argv[0]. I mean, what you see as "command" in ps or top.
> I've looked at setproctitle.
There are two different things that ps will displ
22 matches
Mail list logo
