> > A better patch is probably the following which also increases the size
> > of the buffer to at least 64k:
>
> Agreed.
One thing to be aware of. That function is syncronous. It will read
as much as it can get, then it will do an "atomic" write operation to
flush the buffer out the other way.
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 20:12, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> A better patch is probably the following which also increases the size
> of the buffer to at least 64k:
Agreed.
So, I was using nc (on FreeBSD) to image an HD over the network and
it was consuming much cpu. It turns out that the buffer used by netcat
is only 2k in size, though the buffer on the stack is 16k.
This patch increased plan to use the entire buffer:
--- netcat.obsd.c.orig 2014-05-19 18:25:23.000
Alexander,
I'd like to thank you for taking the time to answer Theo's questions,
the further advice you've given here, for your patience and the work
that you do overall.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
> Hello,
>
> I just noticed r1.44 to t1_lib.c. I'm not sure that auditing
> opaque_prf_input is a good use of anyone's time -- I think it might be
> better to just run "unifdef -U TLSEXT_TYPE_opaque_prf_input" and be done
> with it.
>
> Here's the history of opaque_prf_input as I understand it:
>
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:16:42PM +0200, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> + cl++;
[...]
> + *p |= (u_char)(fat[cl + 1].next << 4);
> + *p++ = (u_char)(fat[cl + 1].next >> 4);
And here the correct diff, cl + 1 must not be done after cl++ ...
I
Hi,
our guard pages just told me that writefat is vulnerable to an off by one
for FAT12 filesystems. They shouldn't be that common anymore, but better
be safe than sorry.
The diff looks confusing at first, but this default-block is just split
into two cluster blocks, as it's done in readfat (lin
Em 09-06-2014 12:25, sven falempin escreveu:
> Detecting bad network is problematic, i try to access external service for
> this,
> dns and tcp, this can be done inside ifstated.
Do this already, in the same and different ways. It all depends on
what's available for network failure detection on th
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 06:31:45PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> I want to experiment with building some simple efi binaries.
> This diff unbreaks make -f Makefile.cross TARGET=ia64 cross-gcc
>
> OK?
>
> Index: sys/arch/ia64/Makefile
> ==
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
> Em 09-06-2014 12:03, sven falempin escreveu:
>> ifstated is a cool FSM emgine for handling the carp problems,
>> for more complex need , instead of hacking this not complete FSM engine,
>> i would just used another software.
>>
>> The l
Em 09-06-2014 12:03, sven falempin escreveu:
> ifstated is a cool FSM emgine for handling the carp problems,
> for more complex need , instead of hacking this not complete FSM engine,
> i would just used another software.
>
> The last time, i just use plain perl script, because it was convenient
>
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
> Hi tech,
>
> I've been using ifstated for years now for failover my links and
> I've developed quite some tools on top of it. But, I've recently reached
> a cornerstone. I've developed a series of scripts that are called with
> the
Hi tech,
I've been using ifstated for years now for failover my links and
I've developed quite some tools on top of it. But, I've recently reached
a cornerstone. I've developed a series of scripts that are called with
the run argument on the init of each state that perform a series of
tasks. O
On 2014/06/09 14:26, misc nick wrote:
> OpenBSD has one of the simplest and most compact installers out there.
>
> However, at the end of the installation you need to have another internet
> connected OS in order to copy the address of the mirror you wish to use
> for package management to your f
Eww...
See distrib/notes/mirrors and installpath from pkg.conf(5).
Commited. Thanks.
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014, Benjamin Baier wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 00:57:43 +1000
>
> Joel Sing wrote:
> > In this case I think readability wins. I do not believe that there is a
> > lot to gain from overflow protection given the numbers used in these
> > calculations are very small
OpenBSD has one of the simplest and most compact installers out there.
However, at the end of the installation you need to have another internet
connected OS in order to copy the address of the mirror you wish to use
for package management to your freshly installed OpenBSD.
Why not include a mir
On 2014/06/08 22:49, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:47:03AM +0200, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > >From Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> > >UNKOWN->UNKNOWN
> > >
> > >
> > >Index: crypto/asn1/asn1_err.c
> >
> > Please refrain from sending diffs you obviously didn't test.
> >
> > Miod
>
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
