On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Ralph Siegler wrote:
...
> So, let's see you successfully submit patches to *remove* those
> non-2008.1 features and backwards compatibilities to .1 and even before,
> and fix the collateral damage to the distro that the minus diffs cause.
> I double-dog dare you.
> nobody [openbsd.as.a.desk...@gmail.com] wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > -
> > 1)
> > If I search for "openbsdfoundation" on:
> >
> > - Facebook
> > - Twitter
> > - Youtube
> > - Instagram
> > - Flickr
> > - Slideshare
> > - etc..
> >
> > I get ZERO results regarding the
nobody [openbsd.as.a.desk...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> -
> 1)
> If I search for "openbsdfoundation" on:
>
> - Facebook
> - Twitter
> - Youtube
> - Instagram
> - Flickr
> - Slideshare
> - etc..
>
> I get ZERO results regarding the topic.
>
I was thinking, maybe
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 11:36:56 -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> On 12 April 2014 10:47, Ralph Siegler wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:56:52 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
>>
>>
Meanwhile, OpenBSD doesn't have the 100% 2008.1 beef stamp on its
hind quarters but will compile and run code
On 12 April 2014 10:47, Ralph Siegler wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:56:52 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
>
>>> Meanwhile, OpenBSD doesn't have the 100% 2008.1 beef stamp on its hind
>>> quarters but will compile and run code having those
>>> functions..which is better?
>>
>> Best for what?
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:10:05 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Ralph Siegler wrote:
>> > Well, starting with r1.54 [0], stdlib.h never declares getopt().
>> > However, I think the conversation could continue in spite of that.
>> > I would expect "motivation" to be aggregated cos
This diff will properly initialize cpsw if uboot hasn't done so already. It
also adds support for 1000BaseT (RGMII) PHY found on some boards. Based heavily
on a netbsd diff. My BBB is out of comission so please test this and provide
feedback. Thanks.
diff -r 4d62a2f27093 -r 961793eb2b24 src/sy
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:56:52 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> Meanwhile, OpenBSD doesn't have the 100% 2008.1 beef stamp on its hind
>> quarters but will compile and run code having those
>> functions..which is better?
>
> Best for what?
best for the particular example I gave. There are o
