Re: dd oldebcdic is old

2014-03-24 Thread Theo de Raadt
I don't see any point in doing this. Justify it. > Last call, convert your oldebcdic tapes (not to be confused with old > ebcdic tapes) now before it's too late. > > > > Index: args.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/dd/args.c,v > r

Re: dd oldebcdic is old

2014-03-24 Thread patrick keshishian
On 3/24/14, Ted Unangst wrote: > Last call, convert your oldebcdic tapes (not to be confused with old > ebcdic tapes) now before it's too late. Just curious why this removal? Saving space? --patrick > Index: args.c > === > RCS fil

dd oldebcdic is old

2014-03-24 Thread Ted Unangst
Last call, convert your oldebcdic tapes (not to be confused with old ebcdic tapes) now before it's too late. Index: args.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/dd/args.c,v retrieving revision 1.23 diff -u -p -r1.23 args.c --- args.c 24 M

Re: thinkpad adaptive keyboard patch

2014-03-24 Thread rivo nurges
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 07:11:09PM +, rivo nurges wrote: Hi! > New 2nd generation Lenovo X1 Carbon has touchable lcd strip instead > of the F1-12 keys and the multimedia keys. It has 5 modes with tons > of useless buttons triggering acpi hotkey events and 6th inactive > mode. > > This patch

xucred change

2014-03-24 Thread Marc Espie
I found out, after a bit of head-scratching, that you will have to make sure you're running the newly compiled mountd if you want cred-mapping to make sense. e.g., the usual "build kernel, reboot, make build" is not enough. You also have to kill mountd and start the new one, otherwise -maproot=ro

Stop mixing route and address flags

2014-03-24 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Diff below stops mixing interface address flags with routing entry ones and makes it explicitly which flag are used especially with the cloning flag. This is part of my work to cleanup the rtinit() interface to be able to reuse it for creating local route entries. This diff should not introduce a

Re: dd gigabytes

2014-03-24 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:20:29PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Fine with me. > > dd is often used in portable scripts. Do we need to document this > as an extension, or has it already arrived in other implimentations? > it should be added to the note in STANDARDS describing the other multipli