> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:35:27 +0100
> From: Frank Brodbeck
>
> Hi all,
>
> ${ARCH} in the release(8) manpage always bothered me somehow. Probably
> it's because I do like copy&paste and I think introducing a variable
> here is not useful as everybody willing to build from source should know
buglet 1:
When booting and the screen goes to its 34 line 85 column mode the text
mode fits into 30cm wide and 22cm high at the top left corner of a 38cm
wide 30cm high screen.
X runs full screen.
buglet 2:
When capturing the dmesg into a file on a USB mem there was no white on
blue notice tellin
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 09:07:04PM +0100, Florian Riehm wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> I'm using the ospfd with redistribute rtlabel statements.
> If I add new addresses to interfaces with a route label, ospfd will
> not notice it, because the route messages don't contain the route
> label. Please have a
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 04:00:25PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 04/02/14(Tue) 10:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below removes an old comment about bsdi4 and make it clear that
> > netmasks are not needed for routes to host.
> >
> > ok?
>
> Anybody?
>
OK claudio@
>
> >
> > Index: n
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:43:51PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:30:47 -0500
> > From: Brad Smith
> >
> > > Index: arch/socppc/dev/if_tsec.c
> > > ===
> > > RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/arch/socppc/dev/if_t
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 04:00:25PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 04/02/14(Tue) 10:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below removes an old comment about bsdi4 and make it clear that
> > netmasks are not needed for routes to host.
> >
> > ok?
OK bluhm@
>
> Anybody?
>
>
> >
> > Index: net
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 09:07:04PM +0100, Florian Riehm wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> I'm using the ospfd with redistribute rtlabel statements.
> If I add new addresses to interfaces with a route label, ospfd will
> not notice it, because the route messages don't contain the route
> label. Please have a
On 2014/02/11 22:35, Frank Brodbeck wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ${ARCH} in the release(8) manpage always bothered me somehow. Probably
> it's because I do like copy&paste and I think introducing a variable
> here is not useful as everybody willing to build from source should know
> what $(uname -m) does:
Hi all,
${ARCH} in the release(8) manpage always bothered me somehow. Probably
it's because I do like copy&paste and I think introducing a variable
here is not useful as everybody willing to build from source should know
what $(uname -m) does:
Index: release.8
with the totals (-I) option, most of the fields overflow. comically.
this bumps many of their sizes, such that at least my laptop with
a whopping three hours uptime doesn't print out a tangled mess. normal
display untouched. if we need to pad the fields larger later we can,
this is a start.
Index
Hi tech@,
I'm using the ospfd with redistribute rtlabel statements.
If I add new addresses to interfaces with a route label, ospfd will
not notice it, because the route messages don't contain the route
label. Please have a look to the attached patch. It adds the
route label, so ospfd can handle it
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:43:51PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:30:47 -0500
> > From: Brad Smith
> >
> > > Index: arch/socppc/dev/if_tsec.c
> > > ===
> > > RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/arch/socppc/dev/if_t
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:30:47 -0500
> From: Brad Smith
>
> > Index: arch/socppc/dev/if_tsec.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/arch/socppc/dev/if_tsec.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.29
> > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.29 if_tsec.c
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:53:24PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> When a carp node sends a neighbor advertisement, because its status
> switch from BACKUP to MASTER for example, it does it using a wrong
> mac address: the one from its real associated interface (carpdev).
>
> Because of this, a ha
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 06:15:44AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 02:08:09AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:21:46PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > >
> > > On 26 Jan 2014, at 11:31 am, Brad Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 31/12/13 5:50 AM, Mike Belopuhov
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:35:02 -0700 (MST)
> From: Martynas Venckus
>
> > Here's a diff that sticks a bit closer to the original code. It's
> > equivalent to your diff, and admittedly purely a matter of taste which
> > version to prefer.
>
> I prefer my version better. It's not '93 anymore
On 04/02/14(Tue) 10:50, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below removes an old comment about bsdi4 and make it clear that
> netmasks are not needed for routes to host.
>
> ok?
Anybody?
>
> Index: net/route.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/nc
When a carp node sends a neighbor advertisement, because its status
switch from BACKUP to MASTER for example, it does it using a wrong
mac address: the one from its real associated interface (carpdev).
Because of this, a hack was added later on to remove and re-add the
route entry to loopback for
18 matches
Mail list logo
