On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 23:55, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Running the updated xf86-video-intel driver uncovered a bug in the
> kernel drm code. The page fault handler wasn't handling some of the
> possible errors correctly. This made the X server die with a SIGSEGV.
> The diff below brings things clo
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 08:35:02PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following bug was recently fixed in DragonFlyBSD and FreeBSD:
>
> libc/net: Fix issue in inet6_opt_init() (from RFC 3542):
>
> * The RFC says (in section 10.1) that only when extbuf is not NULL,
> extlen shall be chec
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 07:44:42PM +0100, Ole Myhre wrote:
> Small patch that make carp send na with router flag set when
> net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1. Otherwise clients will lose the default
> gateway during failover if it was learned from ra.
I think the patch is correct, OK bluhm@
Note that
Hi all,
The following bug was recently fixed in DragonFlyBSD and FreeBSD:
libc/net: Fix issue in inet6_opt_init() (from RFC 3542):
* The RFC says (in section 10.1) that only when extbuf is not NULL,
extlen shall be checked, so don't perform this check when NULL
is passed.
Obtained by: DragonFly
I'd prefer something like this using strtoll(). We can't easily
use strtonum() here since there can be anything past the digits.
The lexer is in charge of matching whitespace and space and newlines
are explicit in the yacc grammar.
For numbers larger than INT_MAX the lexer now returns BIGNUM inst
Running the updated xf86-video-intel driver uncovered a bug in the
kernel drm code. The page fault handler wasn't handling some of the
possible errors correctly. This made the X server die with a SIGSEGV.
The diff below brings things closer to what Linux does, and seems to
fix the crashes I was s
Small patch that make carp send na with router flag set when
net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1. Otherwise clients will lose the default
gateway during failover if it was learned from ra.
Ole Myhre
Index: sys/netinet/ip_carp.c
===
RCS fil
On 2014/02/03 21:48, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Which license is this patch under?
Checked and these files are still under GPLv2 so we're ok from that respect.
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/libiberty/objalloc.c?revision=191413&view=markup&pathrev=191413
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/
Diff below removes an old comment about bsdi4 and make it clear that
netmasks are not needed for routes to host.
ok?
Index: net/route.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/net/route.c,v
retrieving revision 1.151
diff -u -p -r1.151 route
