On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:21:46PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> On 26 Jan 2014, at 11:31 am, Brad Smith wrote:
>
> > On 31/12/13 5:50 AM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >> On 31 December 2013 09:46, Brad Smith wrote:
> >>> On 31/12/13 3:14 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >
> > Date: Tue, 31 Dec
On 26 Jan 2014, at 11:31 am, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 31/12/13 5:50 AM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> On 31 December 2013 09:46, Brad Smith wrote:
>>> On 31/12/13 3:14 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 01:28:04 -0500
> From: Brad Smith
>
> Don't count RX overru
On 27/01/14 3:30 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Some bge(4) chips support IPv6 TCP checksum transmit offload.
Unfortunately, I have no idea which. My best guess is that this
is symmetrical with the receive offload capability:
if (BGE_IS_5755_PLUS(sc))
mode |= BGE_RXMO
Some bge(4) chips support IPv6 TCP checksum transmit offload.
Unfortunately, I have no idea which. My best guess is that this
is symmetrical with the receive offload capability:
if (BGE_IS_5755_PLUS(sc))
mode |= BGE_RXMODE_IPV6_ENABLE;
So here is an experimental patch to
Le 2014-01-26 11:27, Christian Weisgerber a écrit :
Over IPv6, UDP packets must have a non-zero checksum (RFC2460,
section 8.1).
That is no longer true.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6935#section-5
VXLAN and friends use zero UDP checksums over IPv6.
Simon
Em 27-01-2014 01:33, Nicolai escreveu:
> All the TLD and other massive outages say otherwise. I can think of
> one project that uses DNSSEC to verify files via TXT lookups. Their
> last DNSSEC outage? 3 days ago. Ed25519 in signify provides a 128-bit
> security level and is decentralized. DNSSEC pr
