On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:33:56PM -0200, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> DNSSEC would make things a little simpler
All the TLD and other massive outages say otherwise.
I can think of one project that uses DNSSEC to verify files via TXT
lookups. Their last DNSSEC outage? 3 days ago.
Ed25519 in s
Hi,
The following diff fixes getdtablecount(2) HISTORY: this function appeared
in OpenBSD 5.2, not OpenBSD 5.1.
No getdtablecount() here:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/kern/syscalls.master?only_with_tag=OPENBSD_5_1
but it's there:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/ker
Over IPv6, UDP packets must have a non-zero checksum (RFC2460,
section 8.1). Currently, tcpdump ignores this and will print
"udp sum ok". Maybe the author didn't understand how the Internet
checksum works and thought the checksum calculation would catch
this.
OK?
Any better phrasing than "invali
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:04:21PM -0600, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 08:53 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> > I agree with "so-called" having negative connotations.
> >
> > I think both those instances are using it intentionally, namely there
> > are nasty surprises in some MBR blocks
On 01/24/2014 02:09 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Ted Unangst [2014-01-24 17:48]:
Are people still using sk, gem, or hme (!) in pps performance critical
situations?
doesn't make sense to do so, and hasn't in a long time...
Performance critical? Well, given the pathetic speeds available in
the
