It appeared in revision 1.3 ("Update from lite2.")
It's the only one in the string family that has it, and nothing from it
is used.
Index: strsep.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/string/strsep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> * Henning Brauer [2014-01-24 05:50]:
>> i need this tested on an sk(4).
>> I don't have that hardware at all.
>
> this gets rif od a slight little bit more.
>
Resurrected an old box, kernel compile w/ patch is underway. Should
be able to
> Do we have to do any of this if we have been following snapshots or
> -current? Are there any other gotchas related to these for those of us
> who are running snapshots or -current? I haven't had any obvious Bad
> Things jump up and bite me yet, want to keep it that way.
> (Software-related, at l
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014, at 06:50 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> You should realize that the pkg tools have gone thru *major internal
> changes*
> over the last month or so.
>
> If you see weird things happening, now is a really good time to report
> them,
> before it's too late...
>
>
> Also, the 5.4 ->
Hi all running OpenBSD on Apple hardware:
I
was working on the asmc kernel driver for the Macbooks. I have a
MBPro8.2 (mid 2011), and came to get the driver installed, reading all
sensors and temperatures into the "hw.sensors" framework.
See
attached diffs. Beginning line 30 I describe th
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Miod Vallat wrote:
> [cc: tech@, reply-to set to tech@]
[snip]
> Fear not, for I have a diff for you (which I have been sitting on for
> about two years, and only completed and debugged thanks to this
> discussion)!
[snip]
Very cool. I've given it a try now on some limited ha
* Ted Unangst [2014-01-24 17:48]:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 16:27, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > Henning Brauer wrote:
> >
> >> i need this tested on an sk(4).
> >> I don't have that hardware at all.
> > [Summary: Henning wants to confine in_cksum_phdr() to ip_output.c and
> > remove its only
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 16:27, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
>
>> i need this tested on an sk(4).
>> I don't have that hardware at all.
> [Summary: Henning wants to confine in_cksum_phdr() to ip_output.c and
> remove its only other user sk_rxcsum().]
>
> This is an instance
Henning Brauer wrote:
> i need this tested on an sk(4).
> I don't have that hardware at all.
[Summary: Henning wants to confine in_cksum_phdr() to ip_output.c and
remove its only other user sk_rxcsum().]
This is an instance of a very rudimentary RX checksumming engine
that only runs over the pay
You should realize that the pkg tools have gone thru *major internal changes*
over the last month or so.
If you see weird things happening, now is a really good time to report them,
before it's too late...
Also, the 5.4 -> 5.5 update is going to be "fun": there was a kernel flag day.
The proper
On Fri, Jan 24 2014, 12:13 +01:00 David Coppa said:
>On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Stuart Henderson < st...@openbsd.org > wrote:
>> On 2014/01/24 03:41, David Coppa wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a particular reason for dmesg saying "dump" while the
>>> kernel config option is "dumps"?
>>
>> hmm, no
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014/01/24 03:41, David Coppa wrote:
>>
>> Is there a particular reason for dmesg saying "dump" while the
>> kernel config option is "dumps"?
>
> hmm, not sure I like mixing root/swap (noun) with dumps (verb) within
> the single dmesg
On 2014/01/24 03:41, David Coppa wrote:
>
> Is there a particular reason for dmesg saying "dump" while the
> kernel config option is "dumps"?
hmm, not sure I like mixing root/swap (noun) with dumps (verb) within
the single dmesg line...
root on sd1a (5b1b292fa70c813b.a) swap on sd1b dump on sd1b
Is there a particular reason for dmesg saying "dump" while the
kernel config option is "dumps"?
I find it confusing...
Index: sys/kern/subr_disk.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/subr_disk.c,v
retrieving revision 1.163
diff -u -p -u
The diff below cleans up the "fake" uvm locking and the hold/unlock
logic in drm. I'm pretty sure the hold/unlock logic isn't necessary
anymore, but I'd like to see some people test this before I commit.
Thanks,
Mark
Index: drmP.h
===
* Henning Brauer [2014-01-24 05:50]:
> i need this tested on an sk(4).
> I don't have that hardware at all.
this gets rif od a slight little bit more.
Index: netinet/in.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/in.h,v
retrieving revision
16 matches
Mail list logo