On 01/02/14 11:50, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Theo de Raadt cvs.openbsd.org> writes:
This requires an upgrade of the bootblocks and at least
/etc/rc (which saves an entropy file for future use). Some
bootblocks will be able to use machine-dependent features
to improve the entropy even further (fo
>Theo de Raadt cvs.openbsd.org> writes:
>
>> This requires an upgrade of the bootblocks and at least
>> /etc/rc (which saves an entropy file for future use). Some
>> bootblocks will be able to use machine-dependent features
>> to improve the entropy even further (for instance using
>> random inst
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 16:55, Marc Espie wrote:
> Oh come on, that's a bug, and really poor style.
>
> You're going to call err() when there's no meaningful value in errno ?
> That's really a bad example, if nothing else.
ok, sure, make it errx.
but next somebody is going to want to rewrite it
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 10:36:53AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 14:40, Marc Espie wrote:
> > Revisiting the error messages:
> > - pass the filenames to the low-level functions, so they can tell you
> > what's going on.
> >
> > - FIX readall and writeall. The logic *is* wrong
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 14:40, Marc Espie wrote:
> Revisiting the error messages:
> - pass the filenames to the low-level functions, so they can tell you
> what's going on.
>
> - FIX readall and writeall. The logic *is* wrong. Just because they
> return something != len, doesn't mean they return -
While installing OpenBSD 5.4-release or OpenBSD 5.4-current on my
MacbookAir5,1 my screen goes blank after a variable period of time,
usually between 1 and 60 seconds. While the screen is blank, the installer
is still responsive, i.e. if I was at the shell when the screen went blank
and then I
Revisiting the error messages:
- pass the filenames to the low-level functions, so they can tell you
what's going on.
- FIX readall and writeall. The logic *is* wrong. Just because they
return something != len, doesn't mean they return -1.
Okay ?
Index: signify.c
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 12:50, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
> I have a question.
>
> Having no interrupt (and such) entropy means less entropy.
>
> From other hand, there are lot of speculations about some
> hardware entropy sources are suspected (proven?) bad (or
> intentionally hijacked?).
>
> So qu
Theo de Raadt cvs.openbsd.org> writes:
> This requires an upgrade of the bootblocks and at least
> /etc/rc (which saves an entropy file for future use). Some
> bootblocks will be able to use machine-dependent features
> to improve the entropy even further (for instance using
> random instruction
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> the 2013-12-31 snapshot iso images don't work for me under qemu 1.7.0
> / linux 3.12.6. They get this far and then reboot:
I had the same problem too and it was just fixed by jsing@ in
sys/arch/i386/stand/libsa/random_i386.S rev 1.3 (confirm
Hi,
the 2013-12-31 snapshot iso images don't work for me under qemu 1.7.0
/ linux 3.12.6. They get this far and then reboot:
loadrandom: cd0a:/etc/random.seed
cannot open cd0a:/etc/random.seed
loadrandom: error -1
booting cd0a:/5.4/i386/bsd.rd: 6038744+426300
[72+233616+222178]=0x699c6c
entry p
11 matches
Mail list logo