Re: sdmmc update

2013-12-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:52:51PM +0100, Sylvestre Gallon wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:25:52AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 08:10:16PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 08:06:11PM +0100, Sylvestre Gallon wrote: > > > > +int > > > > +rts

Re: PATCH: Allow shared semaphores to be really shared

2013-12-07 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Ted Unangst wrote: > One of the hallmarks of the original libpthread was that all data > structures were opaque, and hidden via pointers. That in turn made it > possible to write a binary compatible librthread. I never would have > started librthread if it hadn't b

Re: PATCH: Allow shared semaphores to be really shared

2013-12-07 Thread Vadim Zhukov
07.12.2013 22:35 пользователь "Ted Unangst" написал: > > On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 21:32, Vadim Zhukov wrote: > > 2013/12/7 Ted Unangst : > >> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 14:11, Vadim Zhukov wrote: > >>> This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing (process-shared) > >>> semaphores via mmap

Re: PATCH: Allow shared semaphores to be really shared

2013-12-07 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 21:32, Vadim Zhukov wrote: > 2013/12/7 Ted Unangst : >> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 14:11, Vadim Zhukov wrote: >>> This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing (process-shared) >>> semaphores via mmap(). This feature is used in the wild, so if we claim >>> that we s

Re: PATCH: Allow shared semaphores to be really shared

2013-12-07 Thread Vadim Zhukov
2013/12/7 Ted Unangst : > On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 14:11, Vadim Zhukov wrote: >> This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing (process-shared) >> semaphores via mmap(). This feature is used in the wild, so if we claim >> that we support process-shared semaphores, we have to implement it

Re: PATCH: Allow shared semaphores to be really shared

2013-12-07 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 14:11, Vadim Zhukov wrote: > This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing (process-shared) > semaphores via mmap(). This feature is used in the wild, so if we claim > that we support process-shared semaphores, we have to implement it, too. > > This changes the

Re: LLVM warning in sys/compat/linux/linux_misc.c

2013-12-07 Thread Paul Irofti
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:59:56PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > On 28/11/13 10:05 PM, Brad Smith wrote: > >Remove unsigned comparison < 0. > > > >../../../../compat/linux/linux_misc.c:1531:24: error: comparison of unsigned > >expression < 0 is always false [-Werror,-Wtautological-compare] > > > >Com

PATCH: Allow shared semaphores to be really shared

2013-12-07 Thread Vadim Zhukov
This patch fixes problems in KDE4, that relies on sharing (process-shared) semaphores via mmap(). This feature is used in the wild, so if we claim that we support process-shared semaphores, we have to implement it, too. This changes the sem_t definition: it becomes a synonim to struct __sem instea