On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 05:27:38AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Andrew Fresh wrote on Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:50:56PM -0700:
>
> > Post vBSDcon I have most existing patches working with 5.18.1, the only
> > failing so far is that with threads enabled
>
> If i understand correctly, we do not curr
Hi,
Andrew Fresh wrote on Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:50:56PM -0700:
> Post vBSDcon I have most existing patches working with 5.18.1, the only
> failing so far is that with threads enabled
If i understand correctly, we do not currently have threads enabled
in our -current base perl 5.16, so that is
Lo?c BLOT [loic.b...@unix-experience.fr] wrote:
> Hello sven,
> it's not a routing table problem, it's only a modification on route
> priorities, it's not the same thing.
The two of you are solving totally different problems.
> Here is my example at work:
>
> I have BGP on the WAN, OSPF for my L
Hello sven,
it's not a routing table problem, it's only a modification on route
priorities, it's not the same thing.
Here is my example at work:
I have BGP on the WAN, OSPF for my LAN (+ over GRE tunnels) and RIP to
my CISCO catalyst 45XX.
The problem is simple. I have two routers in this configu
FreeBSD propose to have a specific routing table for a process, which is
even more powerful.
When the router has multiple gateway i guess when a source address is
choose the route should be chosen given that. Nothing more.
What use of this <> do you imagine ?, of course you may want
this traffic o
Hello @tech
Congratulations for the 5.4 release.
I want to explain a draft to improve a little routing administration on
OpenBSD, maybe for 5.5.
There is a lack on routing daemon, the possibility to change routing
priorities for some protocols.
At this time routing priority is a dedicated constan
Diff below converts the three USB controllers to use a pool(9) for
allocating their transfer descriptors instead of maintaining their
own custom free list.
With it uhci(4) and ehci(4) no longer initialized the "isdone" value
to 1 for every new transfer descriptor (if DIAGNOSTIC is defined).
This i
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 04:56:04PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Oh well. To paraphase (forgive me if i misunderstand), "It ought to
> be easy to write something better than Module::Build, and even though
> nobody has so far volunteered to propose an actual design, and even
> less to write some co
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Fresh wrote on Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:50:56PM -0700:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:31:58PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> -'DISTRIBUTION' => 'DAGOLDEN/Module-Build-0.39_01.tar.gz',
>> +'DISTRIBUTION' => 'LEONT/Module-Build-0.4007.tar.gz',
> It's only 4.003 in 5.
commited, thanks!
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 04:30:51PM +0100, Anders Berggren wrote:
> We tried to get pflow running in a non-default rdomain, and found this to get
> it going. Make sense?
>
> --- sys/net/if_pflow.c.orig Fri Sep 13 20:58:40 2013
> +++ sys/net/if_pflow.cMon Sep 16 13:25:5
- OpenBSD 5.4 RELEASED -
November 1, 2013.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.4.
This is our 34th release on CD-ROM (and 35th via FTP). We remain
pro
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 10:45:16AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/10/31 21:06, Arto Jonsson wrote:
> > Index: usr.bin/systat/systat.1
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/systat/systat.1,v
> > retrieving revision 1.96
> > d
On 2013/10/31 21:06, Arto Jonsson wrote:
> Index: usr.bin/systat/systat.1
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/systat/systat.1,v
> retrieving revision 1.96
> diff -u -p -r1.96 systat.1
> --- usr.bin/systat/systat.1 7 Sep 2013 11:43:50
13 matches
Mail list logo
