Re: openbsd ioctl fix (in6.c)

2013-08-22 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:59:56AM -0700, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > I'm not sure if applies to OpenBSD as well, but NetBSD > also disallowed SIOCSIFDSTADDR for ioctl. > > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet6/in6.c?annotate=1.166&only_with_tag=MAIN > > 1.2 itojun374:

Re: ipv6 atomic draft -> rfc6946 diff

2013-08-22 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:53:50AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote: > Have you verified that we follow the RFC, and not just -00 of the draft? > The RFC actually mentions that OpenBSD-current as of 2012 is following the specification so I think this is OK. > > On 2013 Aug 21 (Wed) at 23:40:12 -0700

Don't iterate over in_ifaddr in in_control()

2013-08-22 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 21/08/13(Wed) 16:29, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Now that IPv4 addresses stay on the interface list even if something > bad occurs during in_ifinit(), I'd like to make in_control() look for > the previously configured addresses on the interface list rather than > on the global list. New try, with

Re: ipv6 atomic draft -> rfc6946 diff

2013-08-22 Thread Loganaden Velvindron
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:53:50AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote: > Have you verified that we follow the RFC, and not just -00 of the draft? > The table of OSes were updated and some terms were changed: A host that receives an IPv6 packet that includes a Fragment Header with the "Fragment O