Re: ral(4) diff that needs testing

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:16:13AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Would appreciate it if somebody could test this diff on a RT2790, > RT2860 or RT3090 variant. Shouldn't change anything for those > variants, but is necessary to support some newer hardware. I have tested on amd64 with ral0

Re: acpi global lock diff that needs testing

On Tue Jul 30 2013 00:06, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Things to test are suspend/resume, whether the battery status is > properly reported and updated, whether the acpitz(4) temperature > sensors are still working, etc., etc. So please run with it for a bit > and report any breakage. Lenovo T400. Test

Re: Stop calling IPsec and pf under splnet

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:30:51AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 12/07/13(Fri) 11:35, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As it was pointed out by dhill there are some rogue splnets in > > the tcp_input that shouldn't be there really. The only reason > > they're still there is to match ove