2013/5/20 Mark Kettenis
> As diagnosed by some other people (armani@, jcs@?) a while ago, our
> code to deal with IndexField() operators in our AML interpreter is
> quite broken. It works for fields that are less than a byte in size,
> but anything else is pretty much completely busted. I would
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:57:56PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> As diagnosed by some other people (armani@, jcs@?) a while ago, our
> code to deal with IndexField() operators in our AML interpreter is
> quite broken. It works for fields that are less than a byte in size,
> but anything else is pr
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:57:56PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> As diagnosed by some other people (armani@, jcs@?) a while ago, our
> code to deal with IndexField() operators in our AML interpreter is
> quite broken. It works for fields that are less than a byte in size,
> but anything else is pr
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:57:56PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> As diagnosed by some other people (armani@, jcs@?) a while ago, our
> code to deal with IndexField() operators in our AML interpreter is
> quite broken. It works for fields that are less than a byte in size,
> but anything else is pr
For our crash, v 1.4 of amd64errata.c is no-op unless we de-static
functions' prototypes.
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
mpbios0 at bios0: Intel MP Specification 1.4
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: AMD Phenom(tm) 9550 Quad-Core Processor, 3600.54 MHz
cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,P
On 2013/05/20 10:56, Aaron Stellman wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 04:30:43AM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > You're mixing up GCM and GMAC. You have to update your config to use
> > aes-256-gcm instead of aes-256-gmac! The GMAC is actually only the
> > authentication part and it is not encrypti
Mark Kettenis writes:
> As diagnosed by some other people (armani@, jcs@?) a while ago, our
> code to deal with IndexField() operators in our AML interpreter is
> quite broken. It works for fields that are less than a byte in size,
> but anything else is pretty much completely busted. I wouldn'
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 10:11:23PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This update xf86-input-synaptics to the latest release 1.7.0.
> http://koba.devio.us/distfiles/xf86-input-synaptics-1.7.0.diff
>
> Tested on amd64 and i386.
>
> Comments ? OK ?
>
> --
> Alexandr Shadchin
>
Prepare d
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 04:30:43AM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> You're mixing up GCM and GMAC. You have to update your config to use
> aes-256-gcm instead of aes-256-gmac! The GMAC is actually only the
> authentication part and it is not encrypting the payload. You can
> see it as "childsa enc n
As diagnosed by some other people (armani@, jcs@?) a while ago, our
code to deal with IndexField() operators in our AML interpreter is
quite broken. It works for fields that are less than a byte in size,
but anything else is pretty much completely busted. I wouldn't be
surprised if this is the ca
On Mon, 20 May 2013 12:43:19 +0300, Arto Jonsson wrote:
> Updated diff. I removed the int width handling and modified the
> separator printing based on your comment.
That looks good to me.
- todd
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:16:55AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> I've taken your diff and merged some useful bits from FreeBSD.
> Specifically, the use of getline() and multibyte support for the
> -d option.
>
> I also made the functions non-static (though I don't think that is
> such a big deal)
12 matches
Mail list logo