On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 13:16, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> I think the minimum number of rounds needs to be documented
> somehow.
>
> I think this magic number needs to be documented.
Here is a simpler version with fewer magic numbers.
Nothing uses this yet, of course, I just want to get the facili
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:44:53AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> So this is is one more step in my effort to merge the various code paths
> to submit an USB transfer.
>
> This diff gets rid of the two badly named functions: usbd_bulk_transfer()
> & usbd_intr_transfer() and makes use of the usbd
On Sun, 12 May 2013 20:57:50 +0300, Arto Jonsson wrote:
> Thanks for the review. Here's an updated diff. If anyone's curious this
> bug is about one month short of being 20 years old.
Committed, thanks.
- todd
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 17:30 -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 20:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2013/05/13 19:32, Mark Lumsden wrote:
> >> I agree. tedu suggest 9 for the number of user rounds and 11 for
> >> root back in 2010. Are these numbers reasonable on most archs?
>
Okay, tmpfs8.diff is still deeply bogus wrt timestamps.
I've fixed some obvious problems with the following change
Tracking tn_status and tmpfs_update showed 3 cases where the mtime got
changed only during the subsequent getattr, thus much too late for make.
Is the separation of the code just a
