> From: j...@wxcvbn.org (=?utf-8?Q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9mie_Courr=C3=A8ges-Anglas?=)
> Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 20:37:25 +0200
>
> Hi,
>
> the lack of hardware-assisted breakpoints support makes the use of
> `watch' painful in gdb.
>
> Has work already been done on this front? If not, are there particul
Hi,
the lack of hardware-assisted breakpoints support makes the use of
`watch' painful in gdb.
Has work already been done on this front? If not, are there particular
reasons that would make it unsuitable / unlikely to be integrated into
base?
I'm currently trying to see what's needed to impleme
I have been making a code scanner for a while, and I wanted to test
a new rule, so I scanned sys/pci/drm. It found an uninitialized
variable in intel_ddi.c.
Quite simple, if !(val & DDI_BUF_CTL_ENABLE) at l.1420, the variable
'wait' is not initialized at l.1432.
I guess I should send it upstream,
On 2013/05/05 10:06, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 05/04/13 01:57, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 07:26, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> >> For a lot of cases this isn't a problem. But there are a couple of
> >> instances where the domain name resolves to something a little to
> >> generic to
On 05/04/13 01:57, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 07:26, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>> For a lot of cases this isn't a problem. But there are a couple of
>> instances where the domain name resolves to something a little to
>> generic to be useful to determine it's origin and hence I'm n
> Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 22:09:33 -0400
> From: Ted Unangst
>
> remove some old 387 flotsam and jetsam.
>
> Index: include/npx.h
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/i386/include/npx.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.17
> diff -u -p -r1.17
