On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:08:06AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Time for attempt #2!
>
> Adding static to internal function allows the compiler to better
> detect dead code (functions, variables, etc) and makes it easier for
> the compiler to optimize; e.g., since it knows a function
Hey all,
Time for attempt #2!
Adding static to internal function allows the compiler to better
detect dead code (functions, variables, etc) and makes it easier for
the compiler to optimize; e.g., since it knows a function will only
called once it can inline code; or not output a symbol for a cert
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 08:07:42AM -0400, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 at 08:08:59 +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > i've committed this, but used the text from freebsd's man page. it was
> > very similar anyway, but reads a wee bit better.
>
> > +.Sh EXIT STATUS
Am 26.04.2013 um 17:09 schrieb Raphael Graf :
> On Thu, April 25, 2013 7:30 pm, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
>> Raphael Graf undefined.ch> writes:
>>
>>> I have a beaglebone (AM3359) running OpenBSD, see below.
>>> Is there any interest in such code?
>>
>> Diffs are interesting. Teasers are not.
On Thu, April 25, 2013 7:30 pm, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
> Raphael Graf undefined.ch> writes:
>
>> I have a beaglebone (AM3359) running OpenBSD, see below.
>> Is there any interest in such code?
>
> Diffs are interesting. Teasers are not.
>
So here's what I have at the moment.
Some parts are jus
Hi Jason,
On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 at 08:08:59 +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> i've committed this, but used the text from freebsd's man page. it was
> very similar anyway, but reads a wee bit better.
> +.Sh EXIT STATUS
> +The
> +.Nm
> +utility exits with one of the following values:
> +.It 0
>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:57:32PM +0200, MERIGHI Marcus wrote:
> there is no more listing (enumerating) of hosts entries. Suspect: [1]
[...]
> [1]
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/getent/getent.c.diff?r1=1.5;r2=1.6
>
> OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #103: Wed Apr 24 09:33:02
On 2013/04/26 12:57, MERIGHI Marcus wrote:
> there is no more listing (enumerating) of hosts entries. Suspect: [1]
> +++
> $ getent hosts; echo $?
> 0
> $ getent hosts fifi
> 127.0.0.1 fifi
> $ getent ethers
> getent: Enumeration not supported on ethers
> +++
>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 06:12:54AM -0500, Vladimir Támara Patiño wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:48:03PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >> + return 1; // If not UTF8 then single byte encoding
> >
> >No C++ comments, please!
>
> The attached patch doens't have C++ comments.
Thanks.
Regardi
there is no more listing (enumerating) of hosts entries. Suspect: [1]
+++
$ getent hosts; echo $?
0
$ getent hosts fifi
127.0.0.1 fifi
$ getent ethers
getent: Enumeration not supported on ethers
+++
So this is inconsistent at least and it introduced different b
10 matches
Mail list logo