Re: Fuse (and sshfs) support for OpenBSD

2013-04-19 Thread Sylvestre Gallon
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Gregor Best wrote: > Hi, > >> [...] >> I will spend the next days working on the NetBSD librefuse, I will try >> to get it working with my kernel code and will come back here when I >> have something that works. >> [...] > > Are there any news on this? If you need

Re: Fuse (and sshfs) support for OpenBSD

2013-04-19 Thread Gregor Best
Hi, > [...] > I will spend the next days working on the NetBSD librefuse, I will try > to get it working with my kernel code and will come back here when I > have something that works. > [...] Are there any news on this? If you need a hand testing stuff and tracking down bugs, I'd be very happy t

Re: Reduce IPI traffic from signals

2013-04-19 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:17:14 +0400 > From: Alexander Polakov > > Hello? > > I've been running with this diff since July without any issues (i386 & > amd64). That doesn't make the diff right. I've indicated better ways to fix the "issue". But I won't have time anytime soon to investigate/

Re: uhub: retry attaching device

2013-04-19 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 21/01/13(Mon) 03:53, Alexander Polakov wrote: > So I have got this device: > addr 2: File-backed Storage Gadget, Linux 2.6.24.2-Boeye with s3c-udc > > The problem is that when I connect it to PC, it asks for confirmation > and I have to press button on the device. I guess uhub exploration code

Re: Reduce IPI traffic from signals

2013-04-19 Thread Alexander Polakov
Hello? I've been running with this diff since July without any issues (i386 & amd64). * Alexander Polakov [121213 18:34]: > This diff reduces IPI traffic for a case when process A is sending > a lot of signals to process B running on a different CPU. userret() > delivers all process signals at o