Re: sasync phase 1 issue

2013-02-26 Thread sangdrax8
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:11 AM, sven falempin wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:09 AM, sangdrax8 wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Stuart Henderson >> wrote: >> > On 2013/02/25 14:41, sangdrax8 wrote: >> >> Any chance someone has the time/knowledge to squash this bug? I >> >> w

Re: cwm duplicate path names

2013-02-26 Thread Todd T. Fries
Given that cwm has origins in 9wm, wouldn't it be appropriate to have firefox and firefox:0 and firefox:1 ? Otherwise, your diff makes much sense as if you typed 'firefox' from the command line, the shell would do what your diff does. Thanks, Penned by andre...@zoho.com on 201302

Re: sasync phase 1 issue

2013-02-26 Thread sangdrax8
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013/02/25 14:41, sangdrax8 wrote: >> Any chance someone has the time/knowledge to squash this bug? I >> would like to deploy some syncing firewall/vpn devices but as they >> are right now I can't put this in my production environment.

cwm duplicate path names

2013-02-26 Thread andres . p
i have both ~/bin/firefox and /usr/local/bin/firefox in PATH cwm will display both in preliminary results. this isn't useful because both have the same basename, so it's not possible to differentiate. not that i would want to distinguish anyway patch below uniqs them, preferring programs first in