RT_TABLEID_MAX size

2013-01-29 Thread def
I very widely using functionality of rdomains and found out, that TABLEID limit is quite small. Whether it is possible to increase the size to be at least 2^32 as is in RFCs 4364 and 4360 which states that RD and BGP target extended community fields Assigned number subfield and Local Administrat

Re: Workaround for an rsu(4) bug

2013-01-29 Thread Brad Smith
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:44:39PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > When working on the WPA-Enterprise stuff, I actually ran into an issue > with the rsu(4) I was using. It seems there is a problem with > submitting the "join BSS" command when an RSN information element is > included, which makes the

Re: Workaround for an rsu(4) bug

2013-01-29 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:44:39PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > When working on the WPA-Enterprise stuff, I actually ran into an issue > with the rsu(4) I was using. It seems there is a problem with > submitting the "join BSS" command when an RSN information element is > included, which makes the

Re: Detect on-die temp sensor for Atom E6xx on amd64

2013-01-29 Thread Matt Dainty
* Christian Weisgerber [2013-01-24 13:03:43]: > Matt Dainty wrote: > > > --- sys/arch/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c.orig2013-01-14 22:23:43.0 > > + > > +++ sys/arch/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c 2013-01-14 22:33:21.0 + > > @@ -506,7 +506,8 @@ > > if (ci->ci_feature_sef

Re: beaglebone JTAG (FT2232H)

2013-01-29 Thread Raphael Graf
On Mon, January 28, 2013 11:29 am, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Have you checked if this is still necessary? libusb on OpenBSD is now able to > talk to devices claimed by drivers other than ugen. Yes, I suspect it is still necessary to use ugen. It seems like libusb does not support bulk transfers o

Re: PATCH: relayd is not working under a non INET6 kernel

2013-01-29 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:09:49AM +0100, Julien Dhaille wrote: > Hi. > With a non INET6 kernel, relayd is not working : > fatal: icmp_init: socket: Protocol not supported. > > Cheers > > Index: check_icmp.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/sr

Re: PATCH: relayd is not working under a non INET6 kernel

2013-01-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/01/29 15:44, Julien Dhaille wrote: > Just tried with a GENERIC kernel, however it's still working. > So, if i follow you, this usage of INET6 define is definitely ugly ? Actually...it is irrelevant whether the kernel has v6 support or not when you build this userland program, the same bina

Re: PATCH: relayd is not working under a non INET6 kernel

2013-01-29 Thread Brad Smith
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:44:02PM +0100, Julien Dhaille wrote: > Just tried with a GENERIC kernel, however it's still working. > So, if i follow you, this usage of INET6 define is definitely ugly ? You're building a kernel without INET6 so obviously you're not using IPv6. So unless you test with

Re: PATCH: relayd is not working under a non INET6 kernel

2013-01-29 Thread Julien Dhaille
Just tried with a GENERIC kernel, however it's still working. So, if i follow you, this usage of INET6 define is definitely ugly ? 2013/1/29 Stuart Henderson > On 2013/01/29 05:40, Brad Smith wrote: > > - Original message - > > > Hi. > > > With a non INET6 kernel, relayd is not working

Re: fix dpms issues on ivy bridge

2013-01-29 Thread Brad Smith
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:13:17PM +0100, Dawe wrote: > On Jan 29, 2013 13:34, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > The following changes mostly based on what has happened in > > the upstream drm code seems to resolve problems with screen corruption > > on power saving/dpms on ivy bridge with ums here. Testin

Re: fix dpms issues on ivy bridge

2013-01-29 Thread Dawe
On Jan 29, 2013 13:34, Jonathan Gray wrote: > The following changes mostly based on what has happened in > the upstream drm code seems to resolve problems with screen corruption > on power saving/dpms on ivy bridge with ums here. Testing on ironlake/ > sandy bridge/ivy bridge (aka Core i*) to make

Re: PATCH: relayd is not working under a non INET6 kernel

2013-01-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/01/29 05:40, Brad Smith wrote: > - Original message - > > Hi. > > With a non INET6 kernel, relayd is not working : > > fatal: icmp_init: socket: Protocol not supported. > > > > Cheers > > I could be wrong but I don't believe there is a INET6 define in userland so > this would jus

Re: PATCH: relayd is not working under a non INET6 kernel

2013-01-29 Thread Brad Smith
- Original message - > Hi. > With a non INET6 kernel, relayd is not working : > fatal: icmp_init: socket: Protocol not supported. > > Cheers I could be wrong but I don't believe there is a INET6 define in userland so this would just break relayd for people using v6. > Index: check_icmp.

PATCH: relayd is not working under a non INET6 kernel

2013-01-29 Thread Julien Dhaille
Hi. With a non INET6 kernel, relayd is not working : fatal: icmp_init: socket: Protocol not supported. Cheers Index: check_icmp.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/relayd/check_icmp.c,v retrieving revision 1.34 diff -u -r1.34 check_icm

Re: Add support for dprintf(3) / vdprintf(3)

2013-01-29 Thread Brad Smith
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 03:29:30AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:15:17PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > > Here is a diff to add support for the POSIX functions dprintf(3) > > and vdprintf(3). > > Here is an updated diff with the feedback from guenther@ and > also updating the s

Re: Add support for dprintf(3) / vdprintf(3)

2013-01-29 Thread Brad Smith
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:15:17PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is a diff to add support for the POSIX functions dprintf(3) > and vdprintf(3). Here is an updated diff with the feedback from guenther@ and also updating the stdio(3) man page. Index: include/stdio.h =