Re: [PATCH] pfctl configuration file parser

2013-01-23 Thread Janne Johansson
Yes, I think the usual "programs should not print if the normal operation went fine" style should keep pfctl -f some-file quiet. Having output in the specific config test mode would not hurt, but it's not something I've been longing for. 2013/1/24 Julien Dhaille : > Oops. > This one is better, onl

Re: [PATCH] pfctl configuration file parser

2013-01-23 Thread Julien Dhaille
Oops. This one is better, only display on : # pfctl -nf /etc/pf.conf Cheers Index: pfctl.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/pfctl/pfctl.c,v retrieving revision 1.314 diff -u -r1.314 pfctl.c --- pfctl.c 19 Sep 2012 15:52:17 -

[PATCH] pfctl configuration file parser

2013-01-23 Thread Julien Dhaille
Hi, Most of daemons like bgpd, ospfd, smtpd, relayd, ... use to return "configuration OK" when the parsing of configuration file is correct. This patch probably seems useless, it's just a thought to stay coherent with an uniform behavior. Index: pfctl.c ===

been playing wit logical domains on a Sun T1000

2013-01-23 Thread Otto Moerbeek
Hi, After seeing the undeadly article I got myself a Sun T1000 and have been playing with ldoms on it. I saw a few things: 1. Partitions cannot be used as backing store for ldom virtual disks, the VOP_GEATTR calls return size 0 for the raw device. I also wonder if other VOP call in vdsp(4) will w