Re: CVS changeset that fixed multiple NIC issue in 5.2-CURRENT?

2012-12-14 Thread Kent R. Spillner
Hey, dude- > The advice is appreciated, but why is it "better"? > > What I need is stability. I now have 5.2-STABLE with the "PCI bus number > resource tracking" and "secondary PCI root segment detection" patches > retrieved from CVS. These patches were applied to CVS not long after > tagging 5.2

Re: CVS changeset that fixed multiple NIC issue in 5.2-CURRENT?

2012-12-14 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Robbert Kouprie [robb...@exx.nl] wrote: > > The advice is appreciated, but why is it "better"? > > What I need is stability. I now have 5.2-STABLE with the "PCI bus number > resource tracking" and "secondary PCI root segment detection" patches > retrieved from CVS. These patches were applied to C

Re: CVS changeset that fixed multiple NIC issue in 5.2-CURRENT?

2012-12-14 Thread Robbert Kouprie
On 14-12-2012 14:12, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > Robbert Kouprie [robb...@exx.nl] wrote: >> Found it. Has to do with detection of secondary PCI root segments. >> > Nick is right. Run -current. It is better than 5.2 in many respects. > The advice is appreciated, but why is it "better"? What I need is

Re: CVS changeset that fixed multiple NIC issue in 5.2-CURRENT?

2012-12-14 Thread Chris Cappuccio
Robbert Kouprie [robb...@exx.nl] wrote: > Found it. Has to do with detection of secondary PCI root segments. > Nick is right. Run -current. It is better than 5.2 in many respects.

Re: [PATCH] OpenSSH: auth.c

2012-12-14 Thread Maxime Villard
Le 14/12/2012 06:27, Darren Tucker a écrit : > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 07:31:46PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I was looking at some openssh code when I spotted a mistake > applied, thanks. Another trivial patch. Make a more detailed error message. Or, we should use strlcpy(). Ok ?

Re: profiling kernels

2012-12-14 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
On 14 December 2012 13:38, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Are profiling kernels known to be broken at the moment? > > I'm trying to track down why my laptop crawls during pkg_add -u > (slow interactive response, 40%+ cpu in irq) but if I run kgmon -b > while pkg_add is running the machine hangs. (no dd

Re: profiling kernels

2012-12-14 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
On 14 December 2012 13:40, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On 14 December 2012 13:38, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> Are profiling kernels known to be broken at the moment? >> > > profiling has never worked on MP kernels... > Hmm, that answers :)

Re: profiling kernels

2012-12-14 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On 14 December 2012 13:38, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Are profiling kernels known to be broken at the moment? > profiling has never worked on MP kernels...

profiling kernels

2012-12-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
Are profiling kernels known to be broken at the moment? I'm trying to track down why my laptop crawls during pkg_add -u (slow interactive response, 40%+ cpu in irq) but if I run kgmon -b while pkg_add is running the machine hangs. (no ddb, no keyboard LEDs). It also hangs after kgmon -b with X run