On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:36:20PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> If there are desires to improve this (I hear Naddy grumbling!) then the
> >> stomach to break backwards compat must be present, or suggestions on how
> >> to do it without breaking backwards compat must be suggested.
> >
> >My sugg
Hi,
here's a 250k diff to update our base sqlite3 to the latest 3.7.14.1 :
http://rhaalovely.net/~landry/shared/sqlite-3.7.14.1.diff
I hope i got the diff right, iirc no local modifications were made to
the actual code.
Mozilla 18 branch depends on it (for no good reason as usual) so i'd
like to
Le 23/11/2012 08:35, Kirill Bychkov a écrit :
> Hi.
> This patch adds fingerprint reader and ati video, found on my girlfriend's hp
> pavillion dv6.
> OK?
>
> Index: pci/pcidevs
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs,v
> retri
>> If there are desires to improve this (I hear Naddy grumbling!) then the
>> stomach to break backwards compat must be present, or suggestions on how
>> to do it without breaking backwards compat must be suggested.
>
>My suggestion is two-fold:
>
>* Introduce a new format. This new format will ig
Mark Kettenis:
> I don't really see what this buys us. You still have to maintain the
> backwards compat code. You'll end up with an inconsistent mess of
> hostname.if and if.whatever files. And all of this to fix what exactly?
To preserve my sanity every time I need to figure out how to bring
On 2012/11/26 17:40, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> anyway...i still dislike the idea of just saying order matters. also,
> could someone really expect the file to not be parsed top down
Yes, I think they might; people are used to config files being read
and parsed before being applied, and because this
> From: na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:44:45 + (UTC)
>
> Todd T. Fries wrote:
>
> > If there are desires to improve this (I hear Naddy grumbling!) then the
> > stomach to break backwards compat must be present, or suggestions on how
> > to do it without
Todd T. Fries wrote:
> If there are desires to improve this (I hear Naddy grumbling!) then the
> stomach to break backwards compat must be present, or suggestions on how
> to do it without breaking backwards compat must be suggested.
My suggestion is two-fold:
* Introduce a new format. This ne
Jason McIntyre wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:19:23PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
>> > > Be more specific about the order of interpretation. Okay?
>> > >
>> > >
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:37:22 +0100
>> From: Mike Belopuhov
>>
>> We've discussed this with claudio and while there are might
>> be some other related issues with pr_usrreq and spls, I think
>> this particular diff needs to be committed.
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:37:22 +0100
> From: Mike Belopuhov
>
> We've discussed this with claudio and while there are might
> be some other related issues with pr_usrreq and spls, I think
> this particular diff needs to be committed. OK?
Whenever a diff like this is proposed, it's worth cons
Penned by Kenneth R. Westerback on 20121126 12:58.45, we have:
| On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:40:06PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
| > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:19:23PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
| > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
| > > > On Mon,
We've discussed this with claudio and while there are might
be some other related issues with pr_usrreq and spls, I think
this particular diff needs to be committed. OK?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 14:18 -0500, David Hill wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I originally asked mikeb if splnet was needed in net/pfke
Any thoughts?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 02:18:35PM -0500, David Hill wrote:
>Hello -
>
>I originally asked mikeb if splnet was needed in net/pfkey.c. He added
>onto my diff (which I have included below). I noticed route_usrreq from
>net/rtsock.c calls raw_usrreq protected by splsoftnet.
>
>I thoug
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:58:45PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> >
> > does "dhcp nwid foo wpakey bar" give you problems too? because
> > hostname.if(5) suggests it should not:
> >
> > A DHCP-configured network interface setup consists of
> >
> > dhcp options
>
> There ha
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:40:06PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:19:23PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > > > Be more specific about the or
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:19:23PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > > Be more specific about the order of interpretation. Okay?
> > >
> > > diff --git share/man/man5/host
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > Be more specific about the order of interpretation. Okay?
> >
> > diff --git share/man/man5/hostname.if.5 share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
> > index b07459f..aa8446f 10064
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > Be more specific about the order of interpretation. Okay?
> >
> > diff --git share/man/man5/hostname.if.5 share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
> > index b07459f..aa8446f 10064
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> don't know about OP, but yesterday i was surprised when rtlabel had to
> be specified after inet
just double checked; s/after/before
ifconfig(8) section on rtlabel bears no mention about the order
before rearranging, lines were just C sor
don't know about OP, but yesterday i was surprised when rtlabel had to
be specified after inet
i haven't fully researched the relationship between the two, but at
least during boot's run of netstart, this is a case where order of
lines and thus ifconfig commands do matter
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Be more specific about the order of interpretation. Okay?
>
> diff --git share/man/man5/hostname.if.5 share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
> index b07459f..aa8446f 100644
> --- share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
> +++ share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
>
On lundi 26 novembre 2012 à 03:31:47, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> Hi!
Hi,
> I needed an option to disable the bell in ksh, and I copied the idea of
> a 'nobeep' option from other shells.
[...]
What about a macro such as...
#define RING() do { if (!...) x_e_putc(BEL); } while (0)
...? Also, x_e_put
Hi!
I needed an option to disable the bell in ksh, and I copied the idea of
a 'nobeep' option from other shells.
Index: emacs.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ksh/emacs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -p -u -r1.46 emacs.c
--- emacs.c
Be more specific about the order of interpretation. Okay?
diff --git share/man/man5/hostname.if.5 share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
index b07459f..aa8446f 100644
--- share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
+++ share/man/man5/hostname.if.5
@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ A configuration file is not needed for lo0.
The configur
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:21:03PM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:55:15AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 08:17:06PM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > > Currently audio hotkeys keys invoke the audio driver code to
> > > raise/lower the volume
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:55:15AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 08:17:06PM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > Currently audio hotkeys keys invoke the audio driver code to
> > raise/lower the volume. The hot key is not consumed, and is send to
> > X which generates XF86XK_
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 08:17:06PM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> Currently audio hotkeys keys invoke the audio driver code to
> raise/lower the volume. The hot key is not consumed, and is send to
> X which generates XF86XK_Audio{Lower,Raise}Volume, which in turn
> are consumed by programs, whic
28 matches
Mail list logo
