On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:01:50PM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the things lacking in mg was support M-x make-directory, which comes
> quite handy. This diff mimics the rather silent behaviour of Emacs: there's
> basically no feedback in case creating the directory fail
The diff below changes the alt sig stack logic to dynamically determine
whether the thread is currently on the alt stack, by comparing the stack
pointer against the altstack base and size, so that you get the correct
answer if you longjmp out of the signal handler, as tested by
regress/sys/kern
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 18:44 +, sbienddr...@googlemail.com wrote:
> As requested.
>
> ddb{0}> uvm_fault(0xd0a50760, 0x0, 0, 1) -> e
> kernel: page fault trap, code=0
> Stopped atdb_read_bytes+0x14:movzbl0(%esi,%ecx,1),%eax
> ddb{0}> ddb{0}> db_read_bytes(0,1,f58ded94,0,2) at db_re
As requested.
ddb{0}> uvm_fault(0xd0a50760, 0x0, 0, 1) -> e
kernel: page fault trap, code=0
Stopped atdb_read_bytes+0x14:movzbl0(%esi,%ecx,1),%eax
ddb{0}> ddb{0}> db_read_bytes(0,1,f58ded94,0,2) at db_read_bytes+0x14
db_get_value(0,1,0,0,f58dee84) at db_get_value+0x2e
db_disasm(0,0,d0
On it's way next bounce.
M
On 11/16/12 18:19, Mike Larkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 06:16:12PM +, sbienddr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
run0 is a external edimax usb device. Page fault occurs when
netstart/dhclient is being processed. Boot up without this network
device installed
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 06:16:12PM +, sbienddr...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> run0 is a external edimax usb device. Page fault occurs when
> netstart/dhclient is being processed. Boot up without this network
> device installed, insert device and manually sh /etc/netstart throws
> out
Hi Mike,
run0 is a external edimax usb device. Page fault occurs when
netstart/dhclient is being processed. Boot up without this network
device installed, insert device and manually sh /etc/netstart throws out
a page fault.
This can happen 2/3 times then finally, whilst performing the above
On Thursday 15 November 2012, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> > external people regularly ask "but why you don't want to use
> > GNU/m4 GNU/make GNU/whatever ?"
>
> External people seem to ask weird questions.
>
> I just had to dig into autoconf/auto*
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:53:52PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> > external people regularly ask "but why you don't want to use GNU/m4
> > GNU/make
> > GNU/whatever ?"
> >
>
> External people seem to ask weird questions.
>
> I just had to dig
1. Just a quick note, has anyone else experienced a page fault when
using a Ralink adapter at either bootup or when running netstat? Seems
to be temperamental.
2. Throwing it out to the masses, what's the best login and net fs
provision? (No-to NFS!!!)
:)
uvm_fault(0xd0a50760, 0x0, 0, 1) ->
10 matches
Mail list logo