On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:53:50PM -0500, Jared Yanovich wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 08:08:14AM -0500, Ian Darwin wrote:
>
> > I like the idea of this change. Just curious - did you choose to ignore
scan_scaled(3)?
>
> Yes I'm quite rusty. I'll repost it when after I have time to test with
t
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 08:08:14AM -0500, Ian Darwin wrote:
> I like the idea of this change. Just curious - did you choose to ignore
> scan_scaled(3)?
Yes I'm quite rusty. I'll repost it when after I have time to test with that.
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-sign
On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 14:46:34 +0100
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:21:38PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> >
> > > Like bge(4), we previously couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum
> > > offload on em(4). We can now.
> > >
> > > Works
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:49:02PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Like bge(4), we previously couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum
> offload on em(4). We can now.
>
> Works fine here on
> em0 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540EM)" rev 0x02
> and with VLAN on
> em0 at
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:21:38PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> > Like bge(4), we previously couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum
> > offload on em(4). We can now.
> >
> > Works fine here on
> > em0 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
>> Like bge(4), we previously couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum
>> offload on em(4). We can now.
>>
>> Works fine here on
>> em0 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540EM)" rev 0x02
>>
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Like bge(4), we previously couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum
> offload on em(4). We can now.
>
> Works fine here on
> em0 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540EM)" rev 0x02
> and with VLAN on
> em0 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000 MT
- endch = 'c';
- new->o_data = find_parsenum(new, "-size", arg, &endch);
- if (endch == 'c')
- divsize = 0;
+ new->o_data = find_parsenum(new, "-size", arg, &endp);
+ if (endp) {
+ if (strlen(endp) > 1)
+ errx(1, "inva
Hi,
The following patch recognizes alternative postfixes to find(1) -size.
Index: find.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/find/find.1,v
retrieving revision 1.85
diff -u -p -r1.85 find.1
--- find.1 5 Jan 2012 13:16:10 - 1
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 06:12:23PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:41:08PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > Previously, we couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum offload
> > on chipsets that require the checksum field to be initialized with
> > the pseudo-header check
10 matches
Mail list logo