Re: find -size postfixes

2012-11-04 Thread Jared Yanovich
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:53:50PM -0500, Jared Yanovich wrote: > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 08:08:14AM -0500, Ian Darwin wrote: > > > I like the idea of this change. Just curious - did you choose to ignore scan_scaled(3)? > > Yes I'm quite rusty. I'll repost it when after I have time to test with t

Re: find -size postfixes

2012-11-04 Thread Jared Yanovich
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 08:08:14AM -0500, Ian Darwin wrote: > I like the idea of this change. Just curious - did you choose to ignore > scan_scaled(3)? Yes I'm quite rusty. I'll repost it when after I have time to test with that. [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-sign

Re: em(4): enable TCP/UDP checksum offload

2012-11-04 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 14:46:34 +0100 Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:21:38PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > > > Like bge(4), we previously couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum > > > offload on em(4). We can now. > > > > > > Works

Re: em(4): enable TCP/UDP checksum offload

2012-11-04 Thread Brad Smith
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:49:02PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Like bge(4), we previously couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum > offload on em(4). We can now. > > Works fine here on > em0 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540EM)" rev 0x02 > and with VLAN on > em0 at

Re: em(4): enable TCP/UDP checksum offload

2012-11-04 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:21:38PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > Like bge(4), we previously couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum > > offload on em(4). We can now. > > > > Works fine here on > > em0 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540

Re: em(4): enable TCP/UDP checksum offload

2012-11-04 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Christian Weisgerber wrote: > >> Like bge(4), we previously couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum >> offload on em(4). We can now. >> >> Works fine here on >> em0 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540EM)" rev 0x02 >>

Re: em(4): enable TCP/UDP checksum offload

2012-11-04 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Like bge(4), we previously couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum > offload on em(4). We can now. > > Works fine here on > em0 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540EM)" rev 0x02 > and with VLAN on > em0 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000 MT

Re: find -size postfixes

2012-11-04 Thread Ian Darwin
- endch = 'c'; - new->o_data = find_parsenum(new, "-size", arg, &endch); - if (endch == 'c') - divsize = 0; + new->o_data = find_parsenum(new, "-size", arg, &endp); + if (endp) { + if (strlen(endp) > 1) + errx(1, "inva

find -size postfixes

2012-11-04 Thread Jared Yanovich
Hi, The following patch recognizes alternative postfixes to find(1) -size. Index: find.1 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/find/find.1,v retrieving revision 1.85 diff -u -p -r1.85 find.1 --- find.1 5 Jan 2012 13:16:10 - 1

Re: bge(4): enable TCP/UDP checksum offload

2012-11-04 Thread Brad Smith
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 06:12:23PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:41:08PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > Previously, we couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum offload > > on chipsets that require the checksum field to be initialized with > > the pseudo-header check