Testing. Please ignore.

2012-09-14 Thread Admin
This is a Test. Please disregard.

mention vdrop in vhold.9

2012-09-14 Thread Michal Mazurek
Taken from FreeBSD. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man9/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.171 diff -u -p -r1.171 Makefile --- Makefile21 Jun 2012 18:02:21 - 1.171 +++ Makefile14 Sep 2012 18:06:46 -00

Re: Use ACPI to detect secondary PCI root segments on x86

2012-09-14 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:31:05 +0200 > From: Christian Ehrhardt > > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:00:12PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > However, there might be a different solution: > > > We could track attached busses (not just host bridge busses but all > > > busses) > > > in the

missing argument in vaccess.9

2012-09-14 Thread Michal Mazurek
vaccess()' first argument is type. Index: vaccess.9 === RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man9/vaccess.9,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -p -r1.7 vaccess.9 --- vaccess.9 19 Sep 2010 13:17:25 - 1.7 +++ vaccess.9 14 Sep 2012 1

Re: Use ACPI to detect secondary PCI root segments on x86

2012-09-14 Thread Alexey E. Suslikov
Christian Ehrhardt genua.de> writes: > > However, host bridges that are handled e.g. in arch/i386/pci/pchb.c > > can appear downstream of another bridge but use bus numbers that are > > outside of the upstream bridge's bus number range. What I understood from the discussion, there is a possibili

missing description for strtod(3)

2012-09-14 Thread Michal Mazurek
strtod also accepts NAN, NAN(xxx) and INF as legal values. Missing part taken from FreeBSD, except that the documentation ommited "INF" and mentioned only "INFINITY". Index: strtod.3 === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/strtod.3,v r

Re: Use ACPI to detect secondary PCI root segments on x86

2012-09-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi, On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:00:12PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > However, there might be a different solution: > > > We could track attached busses (not just host bridge busses but all > > > busses) > > > in the pci cod

Re: tcp ping

2012-09-14 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
On 14 September 2012 11:39, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/09/13 13:54, Matthew Dempsky wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Ted Unangst wrote: >> > This adds a -T portnum option to ping. I haven't polished the output >> > because I'm not sure if this is desirable or not, but I found i

Re: tcp ping

2012-09-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/09/13 13:54, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Ted Unangst wrote: > > This adds a -T portnum option to ping. I haven't polished the output > > because I'm not sure if this is desirable or not, but I found it > > useful. If it's not a "hell no, never in base" I ca

Re: Use ACPI to detect secondary PCI root segments on x86

2012-09-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi, On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:00:12PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > However, there might be a different solution: > > We could track attached busses (not just host bridge busses but all busses) > > in the pci code (or via MD code and hooks but I think that would be a > > generic thing) and do n

Re: usermod: lock/unlock local password

2012-09-14 Thread Ted Unangst
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 08:59, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > Anyone? >> +/* lock the account */ >> +if (strncmp(pwp->pw_shell+strlen(pwp->pw_shell) - 1, > acctlock_str+strlen(acctlock_str) - 1, sizeof(acctlock_str) - 1) != 0) { This looks like a horifically c

Re: usermod: lock/unlock local password

2012-09-14 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:24:04PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:46:57PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 05:01:13PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > This diff adds 2 new options to usermod(8): > > > -U to unlock a user's