Hi tech --
I noticed today that a commit went in today adding -fno-pie to the
kernel Makefiles. [0] Is there a reason that loongson didn't get this
change?
Thanks.
~Brian
[0] http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=134565475206317&w=2
On 22/08/12(Wed) 21:18, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > On 21/08/12(Tue) 20:58, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:17:08 +0200
> > > > From: Martin Pieuchot
> > > >
> > > > Diff below is mostly a rewrite of vgafb_pci_probe() to determine the
> > > > memory and mmio regions based on p
> Granted, the trend seems to be that everything excepts BSDs and Linux is
> dead anyways, so if it builds there, you should be fine. ;(
Does Netcraft confirm this?
> On 21/08/12(Tue) 20:58, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:17:08 +0200
> > > From: Martin Pieuchot
> > >
> > > Diff below is mostly a rewrite of vgafb_pci_probe() to determine the
> > > memory and mmio regions based on previously initialized BAR structures.
> > > But it also i
Hi,
I think I got this now.
- replace time_seconds with time_uptime
- with that flow_finish in pflow can be simplified (pointed out by benno@)
this should take care of flows with finish < start for localy created
states
- change various variables from unsigned to signed (mainly) in pfsync whic
Looks similar to this one
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=131181074820194&w=2
There is some ACPI feature in the 3560's BIOS which I could deactivate
to make the machine start through. Unfortunatly don't remember exactly
which feature it was, CPU states or ACPI C5 states or something like
t
On 21/08/12(Tue) 20:58, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:17:08 +0200
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> >
> > Diff below is mostly a rewrite of vgafb_pci_probe() to determine the
> > memory and mmio regions based on previously initialized BAR structures.
> > But it also includes the gl
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> So, you can use 'div' as the name of a object variable without
> concern...if you're in a standard conforming compilation.
And as long as it's not an object variable of a function pointer type
that you later invoke like "div(foo)" rather t
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
>> But does this mean we start avoiding local variables that shadow
>> functions? This means that div, pause, time, and many other common
>> names are to be avoided as well, doesn't it?
>
> Well, if you write portable code, you should.
>
> Some of
On 08/22/2012 05:05 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:43:25PM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:10:39AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
- prototypes for everything.
Why, aren't forward declaration good enough ?
Not with -Wstrict-prototypes.
But does this mea
> On 2012/08/22 06:13, mu...@nitrkl.ac.in wrote:
>> >
>> > If you try an amd64 -current snapshot, are the disks detected?
>> >
>> > Can you install to a USB stick and get a dmesg / pcidump / acpidump
>> for
>> > amd64?
>> >
>> Yes in amd64 -current snapshot disks are detected. and installation
>> c
On 18.8.2012 11:40, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Further testing would be welcome. Even if you don't use clients with
> power saving enabled. So if you're running an athn(4) based AP,
> please give this a spin.
Been testing this for two days and everything seems to work like a
charm. Testing done wit
> On 2012/08/22 06:13, mu...@nitrkl.ac.in wrote:
>> >
>> > If you try an amd64 -current snapshot, are the disks detected?
>> >
>> > Can you install to a USB stick and get a dmesg / pcidump / acpidump
>> for
>> > amd64?
>> >
>> Yes in amd64 -current snapshot disks are detected. and installation
>> c
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:43:25PM +0200, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:10:39AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > since you have -Werror in your CFLAGS, sndio fails a build with
> > WARNINGS=Yes...
> >
> > The following patch fixes things.
> > - hex constants are unsigned.
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
