Âñå äëÿ ×ÀÑÒÍÎÃÎ ÏÐÅÄÏÐÈÍÈÌÀÒÅËß åäèíùèêà.
Êðàòêî äëÿ þðèäè÷åñêèõ ëèö - ïëàòåëüùèêîâ åäèíîãî íàëîãà
ÂÍÈÌÀÍÈÅ!!- ñ 1.07 áóäóò äîíà÷èñëÿòü ïî îáû÷íûì öåíàì ïðè ðàáîòå ñ ×Ï: êàê
ïîäñòðàõîâàòüñÿ. Ââîäÿòñÿ íîâûå ãðóïïû (5 è 6) åäèíîãî íàëîãà.
22 àâãóñòà, Êèåâ âàæíî äëÿ âñåõ ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëåé ÷òîáû íå
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Thursday 16 August 2012, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>> could you please tell me if you're using tx interrupt or not?
>> if yes, why do you need to have a watchdog code implement
>> a txeof path and not the actual reset?
>
> In normal operation
On Thursday 16 August 2012, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> could you please tell me if you're using tx interrupt or not?
> if yes, why do you need to have a watchdog code implement
> a txeof path and not the actual reset?
In normal operation, tx interrupts are not used and the sent
descriptors are clean
Hello.
Please tell me how to add code to com_puc_attach() of
sys/dev/puc/com_puc.c from OpenBSD-5.1 so the kernel
can work with the known UART type without device probing?
Perhaps my way is not quite correct, in this case
please tell me which way to go.
void
com_puc_attach(parent, self, aux)
Ìàðêåòèíã â ñîöèàëüíûõ ñåòÿõ. ÌÎÄ (ìåõàíèçì îáðàçîâàíèÿ äîõîäà)
18-19 àâãóñòà â Êèåâå ïðîéäåò 12-÷àñîâûé òðåíèíã äèðåêòîðà ïåðâîãî â Ðîññèè
PR-àãåíñòâà "GREENPR", ñïåöèàëèçèðîâàííîãî íà ìàðêåòèíãå â ñîöèàëüíûõ-ñåòÿõ
Äàìèðà Õàëèëîâà.
Äàìèð Õàëèëîâ - SMM - ñïåöèàëèñò ¹1 â ÑÍÃ.
Êëèåíòû Äàìèðà Õàëèëîâà
