Hi,
In case someone is interested, I have tried to run a comparison between
the new Virtio network driver and e1000 emulation.
This is more of a real life home usage example, I have used my personal
firewall setup for the tests. Your results may vary. I have issued pfctl
-Fa for the tests. The
Фирма Shigis.ru предлагает Вам свои услуги:
разработка сайтов и логотипов, подбор индивидуального дизайна,
разработка рекламных банеров и визиток. Наши цены приятно удивят Вас.
Сайт "под ключ" от 8 тыс. рублей
Дизайн и создание логотипа от 1 тыс. рублей
Разработка
Try reading the whole thread. It's quite clear that OpenBSD in general,
not just a single developers opionino, has no interest in such a closed
system.
The referenced post sums up the whole thread, but you seem like you need more
convincing, so go do more homework and convince yourself.
There ar
On 07/25/2012 12:14 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 17:38, Paul de Weerd wrote:
Please read
http://www.vidarholen.net/~vidar/overwriting_hard_drive_data.pdf
I think it's time to stop propagating the Guttman lies. Overwriting
more than once does not help.
In fairness to Guttman
Penned by Ted Unangst on 20120725 11:14.05, we have:
| On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 17:38, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| > Please read
| >
| > http://www.vidarholen.net/~vidar/overwriting_hard_drive_data.pdf
| >
| > I think it's time to stop propagating the Guttman lies. Overwriting
| &
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 17:38, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Please read
>
> http://www.vidarholen.net/~vidar/overwriting_hard_drive_data.pdf
>
> I think it's time to stop propagating the Guttman lies. Overwriting
> more than once does not help.
In fairness to Guttman, he's not the liar. The paper, l
tian Weisgerber on 20120725 9:37.07, we have:
| | Ted Unangst wrote:
| |
| | > So I'm wiping a file from a fairly slow USB stick and it's taking
| | > forever. I don't really give a shit about some guy with a quantum
| | > tachyon microscope taking it apart,
| |
| | But
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Replace the memset() in pass() with arc4random_buf()
It needs to be moved into the loop, of course.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Todd T. Fries wrote:
> There is a paper entitled "Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and
> Solid-State Memory"
> from the Sixth (6th) Annual USENiX Security Symposium that talks about this.
My reading of that paper and the Wikipedia article suggests it's not
v
Penned by Christian Weisgerber on 20120725 9:37.07, we have:
| Ted Unangst wrote:
|
| > So I'm wiping a file from a fairly slow USB stick and it's taking
| > forever. I don't really give a shit about some guy with a quantum
| > tachyon microscope taking it a
Ted Unangst wrote:
> So I'm wiping a file from a fairly slow USB stick and it's taking
> forever. I don't really give a shit about some guy with a quantum
> tachyon microscope taking it apart,
But if you do, overwriting with a constant pattern is stupid. You
want to overwrite the old data with
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 09:34, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:20:55PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> I think this option should be available.
> Note sure it's a good idea, since it's a non-negligible performance loss
> for all sqlite users if you change it to default to true. For
Si no podes visualizar este mail, ingresa a:
http://news1.bonuscupon.com.ar/r.html?uid=1.24.295h.11a.9qp6grd0b1
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:20:55PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> I think this option should be available.
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libsqlite3/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.8
> diff -u -p -r1.8 Makefile
> -
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:20:55PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> I think this option should be available.
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libsqlite3/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.8
> diff -u -p -r1.8 Makefile
> -
15 matches
Mail list logo
