Penned by Mike Belopuhov on 20120609 6:17.29, we have:
| On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Stuart Henderson
| wrote:
| > On 2012/06/09 14:09, Alexander Polakov wrote:
| >> > I appreciate that the defaults would stay the same, but really,
| >> > what is the point in doin
> So perhaps it is better for mg to behave more like emacs when it comes
> to saving backup files in a single directory. Especially if a user has
> two files open with the same name and are working on them
> simultaneously. In this diff I've added the path to the backup file
> name. Like emacs, it
On 2012/06/09 12:04, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 09:07:13PM +0400, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> >> I'd like to start a discussion about adding tiling to cwm with
> >> these two diffs.
> >
> > How hard can it be
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 09:07:13PM +0400, Alexander Polakov wrote:
>> I'd like to start a discussion about adding tiling to cwm with
>> these two diffs.
>
> How hard can it be to import spectrwm... You're reinventing the wheel
> here, badly.
>
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Weldon Goree wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 14:26 +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
>> I agree completley with you. Being able to tile just a given virtual
>> desktop and leave the others intact would be pretty awesome.
>
> Except they aren't desktops. Desktops are exclusiv
Royal Beach Resort & Spa, Sharjah, UAE
SUMMER CORPORATE PROMOTION
(01.06.2012 To 30.09.2012)
Five-Stars & Brand New, Fully Operational, Ready to Welcome You !
Single Room : Dhs.240/- per night
Double Room : Dhs.280/- per night
Book Now !
reservati...@royalbeachresortspa.com
http://www.royalbeach
> I agree that simply "min = -upper_bound % upper_bound" should be
> sufficient in all cases, since u_int32_t arithmetic is defined as
> modulo 2**32 by the C standard, at least as of C99 and I think C89
> too. (Even if we supported any 1s-complement architectures, the
> compiler would still need
On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 14:26 +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
> I agree completley with you. Being able to tile just a given virtual
> desktop and leave the others intact would be pretty awesome.
Except they aren't desktops. Desktops are exclusively selected, cwm
groups aren't (necessarily), and have a z
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 02:26:04PM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
> I agree completley with you. Being able to tile just a given virtual
> desktop and leave the others intact would be pretty awesome.
>
> Turning it into a full blown tiling wm isn't what's being proposed from
> what I understand.
An id
I agree completley with you. Being able to tile just a given virtual
desktop and leave the others intact would be pretty awesome.
Turning it into a full blown tiling wm isn't what's being proposed from
what I understand.
On 2012 Jun 09 (Sat) at 13:17:29 +0200 (+0200), Mike Belopuhov wrote:
:On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Stuart Henderson
:wrote:
:> On 2012/06/09 14:09, Alexander Polakov wrote:
:>> > I appreciate that the defaults would stay the same, but really,
:>> > what is the point in doing this? cwm can't
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2012/06/09 14:09, Alexander Polakov wrote:
>> > I appreciate that the defaults would stay the same, but really,
>> > what is the point in doing this? cwm can't be everything to
>> > everyone.
>>
>> The point is: when you want tiling fr
The following diff fixes a couple of small issues with the AMD chipset
attach functions..
- Have the SB700 attach routine properly call the IDE to AHCI
function and migrate the ATI_SBX00_SATA_1 PCI id to using
the SB700 attach routine. The SB600 routine was being used
because it does the pro
On 2012/06/09 14:09, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> > I appreciate that the defaults would stay the same, but really,
> > what is the point in doing this? cwm can't be everything to
> > everyone.
>
> The point is: when you want tiling from time to time, it's impractical
> to switch to a tiling window
* Thomas Pfaff [120608 23:06]:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:57:35 -0400
> Okan Demirmen wrote:
>
> > On Fri 2012.06.08 at 19:40 +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 21:07:13 +0400
> > > Alexander Polakov wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd like to start a discussion about adding tiling to cwm w
+1
On Jun 9, 2012 5:46 AM, "Christiano F. Haesbaert"
wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2012 9:22 PM, "Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas"
> wrote:
> >
> > Antoine Jacoutot writes:
> > > I for one would love cwm to have tiling management.
> > > I don't care avout the alternative, they are not in base.
> >
> > Same he
* Tobias Ulmer [120609 11:32]:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 09:07:13PM +0400, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> > I'd like to start a discussion about adding tiling to cwm with
> > these two diffs.
>
> How hard can it be to import spectrwm... You're reinventing the wheel
> here, badly.
No, I am not. I'm r
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 08:30:59AM +0200, robert wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 10:21:43PM -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
> > wrote:
> > > On Jun 8, 2012 9:22 PM, "J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas"
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> >
Si no podes visualizar este mail, ingresa a:
http://news1.bonuscupon.com.ar/r.html?uid=1.12.295h.j7.kdef7sal32
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 12:45:55PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This update xkeyboard-config to the latest release 2.6.
> http://koba.devio.us/distfiles/xkeyboard-config-2.6.diff
>
> NOTE: Some old/unused material cleaned up
>
> Tested on amd64.
>
> Comments ? OK ?
>
Works well
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 09:07:13PM +0400, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> I'd like to start a discussion about adding tiling to cwm with
> these two diffs.
How hard can it be to import spectrwm... You're reinventing the wheel
here, badly.
21 matches
Mail list logo
