> -u -user should work, did you test it? I thought getopt was smart
> enough to know if an argument is needed, it comes next. I think
> that's nicer than a different letter for command line and interactive
> mode.
>From the man page:
-U user
Show only those processes owned by
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 13:37, Brynet wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:09:54PM -0400, Brynet wrote:
>> I wasn't sure about the interactions between getopt(3) and having an
>> '-' as an optarg.
>>
>> Seems there isn't anything obvious, so this allows users to be hidden
>> using: top -U -user
-u
> Hopefully this is the final diff.
>
> Showing a single user and then hiding them will now work as one would
> expect.
>
> I also forgot to update usage().
looks reasonable. ok lum@
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:09:54PM -0400, Brynet wrote:
> I wasn't sure about the interactions between getopt(3) and having an
> '-' as an optarg.
>
> Seems there isn't anything obvious, so this allows users to be hidden
> using: top -U -user
>
> Any comments?
> -Bryan.
Hopefully this is the fin
I'd like to start a discussion about adding tiling to cwm with
these two diffs.
First diff adds a helper function to get the area of the screen.
I don't have a second screen here, so no idea if it works with
Xinerama (please test!).
Index: calmwm.h
netstat -ss presented me with these IPsec statistics:
esp:
40 packets where counter wrapping was detected
ah:
36520954 input AH packets
34978358 output AH packets
6 packets that failed verification received
10 packets attempted to use an invalid TDB
> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 15:36:22 -0400
> From: Matt Dainty
>
> As before but with the verbosity of the attach line tuned down a notch
> and not printing extra ':'s as pointed out by Theo. So now it looks
> like this:
>
> ---8<---
> tcpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 "Intel E600 LPC" rev 0x00: 143
