Re: Use a default device for eject(1)

2012-05-20 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 20/05/12(Sun) 13:40, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:36:16AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > On 20/05/12(Sun) 11:26, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 04:46:40PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > > > Diff below makes eject(1) use cd0 as defa

Re: Use a default device for eject(1)

2012-05-20 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:36:16AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > On 20/05/12(Sun) 11:26, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 04:46:40PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > > Diff below makes eject(1) use cd0 as default device like cdio(1) does. > > > > > > > > I'm aware thi

Re: Use a default device for eject(1)

2012-05-20 Thread Theo de Raadt
> On 20/05/12(Sun) 11:26, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 04:46:40PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > Diff below makes eject(1) use cd0 as default device like cdio(1) does. > > > > > > I'm aware this is an arbitrary choice but I see no drawback in having > > > a default

Re: Use a default device for eject(1)

2012-05-20 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 20/05/12(Sun) 11:26, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 04:46:40PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > Diff below makes eject(1) use cd0 as default device like cdio(1) does. > > > > I'm aware this is an arbitrary choice but I see no drawback in having > > a default device to ej

Re: Use a default device for eject(1)

2012-05-20 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 04:46:40PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Diff below makes eject(1) use cd0 as default device like cdio(1) does. > > I'm aware this is an arbitrary choice but I see no drawback in having > a default device to eject and this behavior is coherent with cdio(1)'s. > > Ok? Th

Re: Use a default device for eject(1)

2012-05-20 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Martin, Martin Pieuchot wrote on Sun, May 20, 2012 at 04:46:40PM +0200: > Diff below makes eject(1) use cd0 as default device like cdio(1) does. > > I'm aware this is an arbitrary choice but I see no drawback in having > a default device to eject and this behavior is coherent with cdio(1)'s.

Re: Use a default device for eject(1)

2012-05-20 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 04:46:40PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Diff below makes eject(1) use cd0 as default device like cdio(1) does. > > I'm aware this is an arbitrary choice but I see no drawback in having > a default device to eject and this behavior is coherent with cdio(1)'s. > > Ok? Bu

Use a default device for eject(1)

2012-05-20 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Diff below makes eject(1) use cd0 as default device like cdio(1) does. I'm aware this is an arbitrary choice but I see no drawback in having a default device to eject and this behavior is coherent with cdio(1)'s. Ok? Index: mt.c ===

Re: Future of PF

2012-05-20 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sat, 19 May 2012 21:09:03 -0400 Jiri B wrote: > You can suggest whatevery you want, words are for free : :D

Access temporarily suspended

2012-05-20 Thread HSBC Premier
Pan Customer Communication Pan Customer Communication Pan Customer Communication Pan Customer Communication Credit Card Gift 360 Dear Customer, To ensure your information is secure, your HSBC Bank Middle East access has been temporarily disabled. This could be either because the secret answe