This patch fixes the invalid uptime for interface which are not active
(no link). When ldpd is running on an interface with no link it shows a
invalid value.
Steps to reproduce:
1 - Configure ldpd on an interface without link
2 - Start ldpd
3 - Run 'ldpctl show interfaces'
Bugged result:
Interfac
I'm looking for oks on this diff to commit it.
* Leonardo Guardati [2012-05-10 21:29]:
> Hi,
> here is a solution to the problem I posted on bugs@ about pf logging
> incoming UDP packets to port 0 as pass while being blocked instead.
>
> action is added to pflog_packet() arguments.
>
> I trie
Hi,
here is a solution to the problem I posted on bugs@ about pf logging
incoming UDP packets to port 0 as pass while being blocked instead.
action is added to pflog_packet() arguments.
I tried it and works.
Here are the diffs:
--- if_pflog.c 2012-05-10 20:04:40.16484 +0200
+++ if_pflog-
Para visualizar correctamente este newsletter ingresa a
http://news1.bonuscupon.com.ar/r.html?uid=1.d.295h.5s.p7d8em4epv
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 05:00:19PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > Look, landry just reminded me that I forgot to commit this. It was mostly
> > awaiting test results, and we've been running with this for almost two
> > months.
> >
> > If you think something else is better, take it upstream, since
> Look, landry just reminded me that I forgot to commit this. It was mostly
> awaiting test results, and we've been running with this for almost two
> months.
>
> If you think something else is better, take it upstream, since I actually
> took the fix from recent gcc, and I'd prefer to avoid diver
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:46:26AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> > #define __glibcxx_max(T) \
> > - (__glibcxx_signed (T) ? ((T)1 << __glibcxx_digits (T)) - 1 : ~(T)0)
> > + (__glibcxx_signed (T) ? \
> > + (T)1 << (__glibcxx_digits
Oh even if it's not signed that ternary branch will still be in code. I
see. Hm.
On May 10, 2012 9:23 AM, "Matthew Dempsky" wrote:
I'm pretty sure unsigned int is never a signed type.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:46:26AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> > #define __glibcxx_max(T) \
> > - (__glibcxx_signed (T) ? ((T)1 << __glibcxx_digits (T)) - 1 : ~(T)0)
> > + (__glibcxx_signed (T) ? \
> > + (T)1 << (__glibcxx_digit
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> #define __glibcxx_max(T) \
> - (__glibcxx_signed (T) ? ((T)1 << __glibcxx_digits (T)) - 1 : ~(T)0)
> + (__glibcxx_signed (T) ? \
> + (T)1 << (__glibcxx_digits (T) - 1)) - 1) << 1) + 1) : ~(T)0)
> +
How about (T)(((unsigned T)1 << __
On 5/10/12 3:41 PM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> That's a great find. In fact, you're right, "em_start() a few lines up"
> should be done after em_update_link_status because of the link_active.
> The following diff makes it work the same way ix(4) does. Please verify
> that it fixes the problem.
Than
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 15:22 +0200, Erik Lax wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across a real-world scenario where network traffic stopped due to
> interrupt starvation with the em driver, tested with a few different
> cards (on a network/interface where no packets were received). This is
> what caused it.
Hi,
I came across a real-world scenario where network traffic stopped due to
interrupt starvation with the em driver, tested with a few different
cards (on a network/interface where no packets were received). This is
what caused it. I had two computers with a cable directly connected on a
small ne
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:39:18AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > $ c++ -pedantic -c a.c
> > In file included from /usr/include/g++/memory:60,
> > from /usr/include/g++/string:48,
> > from a.c:1:
> >
15 matches
Mail list logo
