On Thu, Apr 12, 2012, Paul Irofti wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:44:55PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012, Paul Irofti wrote:
>> > Requested by guenther, okay?
>>
>> It's harder than that. With this change, the first thread to exit
>> will un-systrace the entire process.
>
>
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:44:55PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > Requested by guenther, okay?
>
> It's harder than that. With this change, the first thread to exit
> will un-systrace the entire process.
Right... I guess the entire device has to be rew
On 04/12/12 09:40, SASANO Takayoshi wrote:
Hello,
I have a system with an asrock a75m-itx motherboard and an amd a6-3500
processor. I notice there is a 40 second delay after the 'ahci0 at pci0
dev 17
...' line.
I have IBM's ThinkPad Edge E525, AMD A8-3500M based machine.
And I checked this
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Requested by guenther, okay?
It's harder than that. With this change, the first thread to exit
will un-systrace the entire process.
Requested by guenther, okay?
Index: dev/systrace.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/systrace.c,v
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -u -p -r1.62 systrace.c
--- dev/systrace.c 20 Feb 2012 22:23:39 - 1.62
+++ dev/systrace.c
Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> While reading the mosh research paper[1], I noticed we don't have
> IUTF8, which is necessary for backspace to work correctly in canonical
> mode (ICANON) with UTF-8 characters.
In principle, IUTF8 should also be added to ssh(1).
I see that the Debian people already mad
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 22:40 +0900, SASANO Takayoshi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I have a system with an asrock a75m-itx motherboard and an amd a6-3500
> > processor. I notice there is a 40 second delay after the 'ahci0 at pci0
> > dev 17
> > ...' line.
>
> I have IBM's ThinkPad Edge E525, AMD A8
Hello,
> I have a system with an asrock a75m-itx motherboard and an amd a6-3500
> processor. I notice there is a 40 second delay after the 'ahci0 at pci0
> dev 17
> ...' line.
I have IBM's ThinkPad Edge E525, AMD A8-3500M based machine.
And I checked this diff fix that problem.
ok or commen
Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> While reading the mosh research paper[1], I noticed we don't have
> IUTF8, which is necessary for backspace to work correctly in canonical
> mode (ICANON) with UTF-8 characters.
Here's a quick diff for stty(1).
Index: modes.c
Now with libkvm bits as well. Okay?
Index: sys/sys/sysctl.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/sysctl.h,v
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -p -r1.122 sysctl.h
--- sys/sys/sysctl.h10 Apr 2012 15:50:52 - 1.122
+++ sys/sys/sys
Got a proposition for you,reply for futher details.
While reading the mosh research paper[1], I noticed we don't have
IUTF8, which is necessary for backspace to work correctly in canonical
mode (ICANON) with UTF-8 characters.
[1] http://mosh.mit.edu/mosh-paper-draft.pdf
I took a quick stab at implementing it, and it didn't seem too bad.
See kernel
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 19:30 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> This moves the accounting flag to struct process where it belongs.
> The main rationale is that accounting flags are being collected on
> the program exit. Ok?
>
don't set AFORK when forking threads pointed out by guenther;
missed suse
* Henning Brauer [2012-04-12 10:11]:
> take out? a slot can be nulled. the index is the interface index, so
> if just pflog25 exists that array has 26 entries.
s/interface index/unit number/
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
S
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 03:33:44PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> Recently, getdelim() and getline() were commited to stdio.
> Shouldn't they also be mentioned in stdio(3)?
>
> (While at it, fixed a grammar glitch.)
>
> Jan
>
fix-ed. thanks!
jmc
>
> Index: stdio.3
> =
* patrick keshishian [2012-04-12 00:52]:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Henning Brauer
> wrote:
> > * patrick keshishian [2012-04-11 14:55]:
> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:20:30PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> >> don't you need two different index vars for this next
> >> section?
> > no, w
16 matches
Mail list logo