Re: move systrace to the process struct

2012-04-12 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012, Paul Irofti wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:44:55PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012, Paul Irofti wrote: >> > Requested by guenther, okay? >> >> It's harder than that. With this change, the first thread to exit >> will un-systrace the entire process. > >

Re: move systrace to the process struct

2012-04-12 Thread Paul Irofti
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:44:55PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012, Paul Irofti wrote: > > Requested by guenther, okay? > > It's harder than that. With this change, the first thread to exit > will un-systrace the entire process. Right... I guess the entire device has to be rew

Re: diff: fix waiting problem on AMD Hudson's AHCI (Re: AMD APU report)

2012-04-12 Thread RD Thrush
On 04/12/12 09:40, SASANO Takayoshi wrote: Hello, I have a system with an asrock a75m-itx motherboard and an amd a6-3500 processor. I notice there is a 40 second delay after the 'ahci0 at pci0 dev 17 ...' line. I have IBM's ThinkPad Edge E525, AMD A8-3500M based machine. And I checked this

Re: move systrace to the process struct

2012-04-12 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012, Paul Irofti wrote: > Requested by guenther, okay? It's harder than that. With this change, the first thread to exit will un-systrace the entire process.

move systrace to the process struct

2012-04-12 Thread Paul Irofti
Requested by guenther, okay? Index: dev/systrace.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/systrace.c,v retrieving revision 1.62 diff -u -p -r1.62 systrace.c --- dev/systrace.c 20 Feb 2012 22:23:39 - 1.62 +++ dev/systrace.c

Re: diff: IUTF8 support

2012-04-12 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Matthew Dempsky wrote: > While reading the mosh research paper[1], I noticed we don't have > IUTF8, which is necessary for backspace to work correctly in canonical > mode (ICANON) with UTF-8 characters. In principle, IUTF8 should also be added to ssh(1). I see that the Debian people already mad

Re: diff: fix waiting problem on AMD Hudson's AHCI (Re: AMD APU report)

2012-04-12 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 22:40 +0900, SASANO Takayoshi wrote: > Hello, > > > I have a system with an asrock a75m-itx motherboard and an amd a6-3500 > > processor. I notice there is a 40 second delay after the 'ahci0 at pci0 > > dev 17 > > ...' line. > > I have IBM's ThinkPad Edge E525, AMD A8

diff: fix waiting problem on AMD Hudson's AHCI (Re: AMD APU report)

2012-04-12 Thread SASANO Takayoshi
Hello, > I have a system with an asrock a75m-itx motherboard and an amd a6-3500 > processor. I notice there is a 40 second delay after the 'ahci0 at pci0 > dev 17 > ...' line. I have IBM's ThinkPad Edge E525, AMD A8-3500M based machine. And I checked this diff fix that problem. ok or commen

Re: diff: IUTF8 support

2012-04-12 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Matthew Dempsky wrote: > While reading the mosh research paper[1], I noticed we don't have > IUTF8, which is necessary for backspace to work correctly in canonical > mode (ICANON) with UTF-8 characters. Here's a quick diff for stty(1). Index: modes.c

Re: ps axH per-thread usage times

2012-04-12 Thread Paul Irofti
Now with libkvm bits as well. Okay? Index: sys/sys/sysctl.h === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/sysctl.h,v retrieving revision 1.122 diff -u -p -r1.122 sysctl.h --- sys/sys/sysctl.h10 Apr 2012 15:50:52 - 1.122 +++ sys/sys/sys

Waiting!

2012-04-12 Thread cliff
Got a proposition for you,reply for futher details.

diff: IUTF8 support

2012-04-12 Thread Matthew Dempsky
While reading the mosh research paper[1], I noticed we don't have IUTF8, which is necessary for backspace to work correctly in canonical mode (ICANON) with UTF-8 characters. [1] http://mosh.mit.edu/mosh-paper-draft.pdf I took a quick stab at implementing it, and it didn't seem too bad. See kernel

Re: move accounting flags from the proc to the process

2012-04-12 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 19:30 +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > This moves the accounting flag to struct process where it belongs. > The main rationale is that accounting flags are being collected on > the program exit. Ok? > don't set AFORK when forking threads pointed out by guenther; missed suse

Re: How to have more than 15 pflog interfaces?

2012-04-12 Thread Henning Brauer
* Henning Brauer [2012-04-12 10:11]: > take out? a slot can be nulled. the index is the interface index, so > if just pflog25 exists that array has 26 entries. s/interface index/unit number/ -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP S

Re: getline missing in stdio(3)

2012-04-12 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 03:33:44PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > Recently, getdelim() and getline() were commited to stdio. > Shouldn't they also be mentioned in stdio(3)? > > (While at it, fixed a grammar glitch.) > > Jan > fix-ed. thanks! jmc > > Index: stdio.3 > =

Re: How to have more than 15 pflog interfaces?

2012-04-12 Thread Henning Brauer
* patrick keshishian [2012-04-12 00:52]: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Henning Brauer > wrote: > > * patrick keshishian [2012-04-11 14:55]: > >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:20:30PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > >> don't you need two different index vars for this next > >> section? > > no, w