The following diff adds support for jumbos with the bge(4) BCM5714/5715/5780
chipsets. I have only been able to find someone to test with a 5714 family
chipset with non-jumbo mode of operation but it's a remote system on a network
without jumbos so not able to test there as well as 5700 family with
f ( e/d:d8e fg+ g5&d= e!!
g5&f(ggh(o<
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
qf1t2c3d<d8h4"e
!e%=
o<ADo< d;#
e<
e
g%(
hg3;d::o<f eg
hg3;g5h/ o<137-1427-5556
bbbbbbbbb
Disponible en 3 jours
Impression HD (risistance UV)
4 supports et 8 finitions au choix
Fichiers: transfert online direct ou diffiri
Commandez en 5 minutes: facile & rapide!
Igalement sur mesure:
adhisifs, affiches papier,
posters photo & papier peint adhisif
Pour toutes les applications
* v
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 01:32:46PM +0200, Bj?rn Ketelaars wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > That sounds like timing bases attacks to guess a username still will work.
> >
> >-Otto
>
> First thing I thought when reading your reply: absolute nonsense. With
>
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> That sounds like timing bases attacks to guess a username still will work.
>
>-Otto
First thing I thought when reading your reply: absolute nonsense. With
that mindset I really wanted to disprove your suggestion. For this I
have set-u
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> * Mike Belopuhov [120404 17:51]:
>> i agree that this is a great find. i don't really like the diff though.
>> i see no point in introducing this macro. what do others think?
>
> Your diff looks better to me.
>
the diff is in. thanks f
* Mike Belopuhov [120404 17:51]:
> i agree that this is a great find. i don't really like the diff though.
> i see no point in introducing this macro. what do others think?
Your diff looks better to me.
> Index: msdosfs/denode.h
> ===
