irrespective of all the talk going on here... :)
-Toby.
Regardless, I stand by my original comment. :)
On Thursday, March 29, 2012, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:00:56AM -0400, Kjell Wooding wrote:
> > There's nothing *technically* wrong with "irrespective," but it is a tad
> > awkward when compared with "regardless."
> >
>
> ther
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:00:56AM -0400, Kjell Wooding wrote:
>> There's nothing *technically* wrong with "irrespective," but it is a tad
>> awkward when compared with "regardless."
>>
>
> there's nothing *at all* wrong with "irrespective"
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:00:56AM -0400, Kjell Wooding wrote:
> There's nothing *technically* wrong with "irrespective," but it is a tad
> awkward when compared with "regardless."
>
there's nothing *at all* wrong with "irrespective". you obviously just
don;t like it (if we don;t use words or phr
