Re: Sysctl(3) man page

2012-03-09 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 05:08:43PM -0500, Donald Allen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Ted Unangst wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2012, Donald Allen wrote: > >> OpenBSD's pride in its man pages is justified, for the most part. But > >> having recently decided to come back to OpenBSD after a

Re: midi: don't spin in the kernel

2012-03-09 Thread Jonathan Gray
Sorry I can't describe this better but midi ends up being played too fast/slow here and some notes have the wrong duration when using eap(4) an mt-32 and scummvm. The timing of when the notes start seems to be off as well. http://jsg.id.au/misc/with_patch.ogg http://jsg.id.au/misc/without_patch.o

Casos Practicos en el Otorgamiento del Credito y Recuperacion de la Cartera en GDL - MTY - MERIDA - MEX

2012-03-09 Thread Herramientas Practicas
CURSO TALLER Casos Practicos en el Otorgamiento del Credito y Recuperacion de la Cartera Duracion: (1 dma) 8 hrs. Inversion por persona: $4,150 pesos mas IVA Objetivo: En este curso los participantes adquiriran una formacisn integral en los documentos que soportan el otorgamiento de criditos a

Re: posix_spawn(3)

2012-03-09 Thread Ted Unangst
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012, Frank Denis wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > Good catch. I'm going to fix that. > > On Mar 9, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Matthew Dempsky wrote: >> I briefly looked over this code, and the diff looks good to me except >> for one subtle FreeBSDism: memory writes done in a vfork(2)'d child >>

Re: posix_spawn(3)

2012-03-09 Thread Frank Denis
Hi Matthew, Good catch. I'm going to fix that. On Mar 9, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > I briefly looked over this code, and the diff looks good to me except > for one subtle FreeBSDism: memory writes done in a vfork(2)'d child > process will not affect the parent process. This

Re: Sysctl(3) man page

2012-03-09 Thread Donald Allen
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2012, Donald Allen wrote: >> OpenBSD's pride in its man pages is justified, for the most part. But >> having recently decided to come back to OpenBSD after a long hiatus, I >> found myself completely baffled by how to get battery

Re: Sysctl(3) man page

2012-03-09 Thread Donald Allen
Jason McIntyre: hi donald. i'm not sure i exactly know what you want to do, but if i run your program it gives me (almost) identical output to that given by running "systat sensors" or "sysctl hw.sensors". i guess that takes care of the idea of providing find-sensor-mibs in userland, or making wha

Re: Sysctl(3) man page

2012-03-09 Thread Ted Unangst
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012, Donald Allen wrote: > OpenBSD's pride in its man pages is justified, for the most part. But > having recently decided to come back to OpenBSD after a long hiatus, I > found myself completely baffled by how to get battery status > information via sysctl(3). I use suckless.org's

Re: Sysctl(3) man page

2012-03-09 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:00:52PM -0500, Donald Allen wrote: > OpenBSD's pride in its man pages is justified, for the most part. But > having recently decided to come back to OpenBSD after a long hiatus, I > found myself completely baffled by how to get battery status > information via sysctl(3).

Sysctl(3) man page

2012-03-09 Thread Donald Allen
OpenBSD's pride in its man pages is justified, for the most part. But having recently decided to come back to OpenBSD after a long hiatus, I found myself completely baffled by how to get battery status information via sysctl(3). I use suckless.org's dwm and there's a little chunk of C called dwmsta

Re: posix_spawn(3)

2012-03-09 Thread Matthew Dempsky
Oh, and posix_spawn_file_actions_init() should return errno, not -1, if malloc(3) fails. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Frank Denis wrote: >> See http://download.pureftpd.org/misc/OpenBSD/patches/posix_spawn.diff > > Hi Frank, > > I brie

Re: posix_spawn(3)

2012-03-09 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Frank Denis wrote: > See http://download.pureftpd.org/misc/OpenBSD/patches/posix_spawn.diff Hi Frank, I briefly looked over this code, and the diff looks good to me except for one subtle FreeBSDism: memory writes done in a vfork(2)'d child process will not affect

Re: A really stupid thing about gecode-3.5.0

2012-03-09 Thread Remi Pointel
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 19:18:09 +0200 Vitali wrote: > Hi, techs. > > I had to build gecode, took it from > http://www.gecode.org/download/gecode-3.5.0.tar.gz > Ran ./configure and there popped up the following error: > > "checking for the host operating system... configure: error: Host OS > not supp

A really stupid thing about gecode-3.5.0

2012-03-09 Thread Vitali
Hi, techs. I had to build gecode, took it from http://www.gecode.org/download/gecode-3.5.0.tar.gz Ran ./configure and there popped up the following error: "checking for the host operating system... configure: error: Host OS not supported." I opened the file configure, found the line GNU/kFreeBS

Re: relayd: statistics are broken [resend patches]

2012-03-09 Thread Erik Lax
On 3/7/12 11:53 AM, Erik Lax wrote: > ... > > Two patches attached below. Sorry for the noise, apparently the patches got broken in transit, blaming the MUA. -- cut -- Index: relay.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/relayd/relay.c,v