On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:48:49 -0500
Brad Smith wrote:
> On 14/02/12 3:17 PM, roberth wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:35:15 +0100
> > Bjvrn Ketelaars wrote:
> >
> >> How and when do we automatically generate unbound-control keys? if
> >> so, where should that be done?
> >
> > Simply don't bother
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:49:37 -0500
Brad Smith wrote:
> On 14/02/12 3:38 PM, Bjvrn Ketelaars wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:17 PM, roberth
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:35:15 +0100
> >> Bjvrn Ketelaars wrote:
> >>
> >>> How and when do we automatically generate unbound-control keys
>> 2.) Testing (read: does it compile and work) on AMD64.
>
> amd64 is easy, better questions are things like does it build/work on vax
> (gcc2, no shared libs), does it work on "unusual" arch like hppa, etc.
I agree, however I cannot help with these arches as I do not have
access to them. Anyone
On 14/02/12 3:38 PM, Bjvrn Ketelaars wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:17 PM, roberth wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:35:15 +0100
Bjvrn Ketelaars wrote:
How and when do we automatically generate unbound-control keys? if
so, where should that be done?
Simply don't bother?
rndc keys aren't setu
On 14/02/12 3:17 PM, roberth wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:35:15 +0100
Bjvrn Ketelaars wrote:
How and when do we automatically generate unbound-control keys? if
so, where should that be done?
Simply don't bother?
rndc keys aren't setup automagically either.
The daemon will work just fine wit
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:17 PM, roberth wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:35:15 +0100
> Bjvrn Ketelaars wrote:
>
>> How and when do we automatically generate unbound-control keys? if
>> so, where should that be done?
>
> Simply don't bother?
> rndc keys aren't setup automagically either.
> The dae
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:35:15 +0100
Bjvrn Ketelaars wrote:
> How and when do we automatically generate unbound-control keys? if
> so, where should that be done?
Simply don't bother?
rndc keys aren't setup automagically either.
The daemon will work just fine without it, let it be up to the admin
w
It turns out that sys/hash.h also uses Chris Toreks hash algorithm
in the same 1:1 way that was present in Berkeley DB a decade ago.
So maybe "i prefer leaving optimization up to the compiler" should
be applied here, too. The patch does this.
And - you know, i never made it into that gcc(1) code
Still looking for ok's...
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 01:27 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As it became evident, ix is driven by Low Latency Interrupts
> on 82599 to do all sorts of processing instead of the regular
> Rx/Tx queue interrupts. LLI is an additional facility that
> is aimed to d
Plantillas Web 15 Dvds
.html .flash .psd / Totalmente Preparadas Para Editarlas
Ade mas Te Llevas De Regalo: Vectores + Curso de Diseqo !!
Para visitar la web y ver detalle Completo haga clic aqui
Plantillas Web 15 Dvds
El enlace no funciona? Enlace alternativo 1 clic aqui
Si no abre ningun link:
* Peter van Oord van der Vlies [2012-02-14
09:11]:
> Why replacing bind ?
1) because it's shit (yes yes vixie, the next release won't be written
by drunken grad students and fix all design and implementation issues,
we hear that since bind4 at least)
2) it's a dead end anyway - i have neve
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:23:01PM +0400, Mo Libden wrote:
> 14 QP5P2QP0P;Q 2012, 12:59 P>Q Gregory Edigarov
:
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:09:16 +
> > Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Why replacing bind ?
> >
> > Because bind is full of security related bugs a
On 2012 Feb 14 (Tue) at 13:23:01 +0400 (+0400), Mo Libden wrote:
:14 QP5P2QP0P;Q 2012, 12:59 P>Q Gregory Edigarov
:
:> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:09:16 +
:> Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:
:>
:> > Hello,
:> >
:> > Why replacing bind ?
:>
:> Because bind is full of security related bugs and
14 QP5P2QP0P;Q 2012, 12:59 P>Q Gregory Edigarov :
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:09:16 +
> Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Why replacing bind ?
>
> Because bind is full of security related bugs and a bloatware.
Oh come on!
They say about the same thing about sendmail f
2012/2/13 Stuart Henderson :
...
>> After tar/gzip the source files and Makefile wrappers weigh ~4.6MB. A bit
to
>> large to send to this list. if anyone feels like looking at the workb&do
not
>> hesitate to mail me.
>
> Please do. It would be nice to put them on a public server.
>
WIP can be foun
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:09:16 +
Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Why replacing bind ?
Because bind is full of security related bugs and a bloatware.
Yours C. O.
> Kind Regards
>
> Peter
>
> - Oorspronkelijk bericht -
> Van: Bjvrn Ketelaars [mailto:bjorn.ketela...@h
Hello,
Why replacing bind ?
Kind Regards
Peter
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Bjvrn Ketelaars [mailto:bjorn.ketela...@hydroxide.nl]
Verzonden: Monday, February 13, 2012 10:35 PM
Aan: m...@openbsd.org
; tech@openbsd.org
Onderwerp: Unbound in base
Hello,
After some recent discussions
17 matches
Mail list logo
