> If an alternative server for syslogd, ldattach, pflogd, named, nsd,
> ntpd, isakmpd, iked, sasyncd, or ldapd isn't suitable then why is it
> even in ports ?
Don't be a jerk.
syslogd is obviously different -- it is the daemon which is started
very early.
Mark Kettenis [mark.kette...@xs4all.nl] wrote:
>
> Perhaps not as stupid as you think.
>
> OpenBSD provides a complete base OS. In principle you only need to
> install packages for add-on software. And there should be no need for
> such add-on software to be started before the base system is up
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:58:31PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 09:24:17PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > i was using a x61s until a month ago. I had these errors too, but only with
> > certain wifi networks (specifically 2 events with 30+ access points and
> > 1000+
> >
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 09:24:17PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> i was using a x61s until a month ago. I had these errors too, but only with
> certain wifi networks (specifically 2 events with 30+ access points and 1000+
> wifi users) using cisco ap's. I never saw these errors somewhere else.
H
Edd Barrett(vex...@gmail.com) on 2012.02.11 11:57:34 +:
> Hi,
>
> I have just upgraded from a thinkpad x60s to an x61s.
>
> The machine came with an iwn wireless card (no suprise really).
>
> After installing the firmware with fw_update, you can start using the
> card but very shortly start
bsearch(3), tsearch(3) contains some superfluous spaces.
Joachim
Index: bsearch.3
===
RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/src/lib/libc/stdlib/bsearch.3,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 bsearch.3
--- bsearch.3 31 May 20
The sample code given in the BUGS section of select(2) contains an
unnecessary cast.
Joachim
Index: select.2
===
RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/src/lib/libc/sys/select.2,v
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -p -r1.28 select.2
-
Hi,
I think i discussed this with someone before, but I forget where we got
with it. Pretty bad timing, I know.
Bring a urtwn interface up, put system to sleep with zzz, then wake it,
firmware shits itself:
urtwn0: could not send firmware command 5
urtwn0: could not send firmware command 5
urtwn
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
fcaramela.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
facuciadora.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
tlinternazo.jpg]
> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:25:10 +0100 (CET)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:14:41 +
> > From: Miod Vallat
> >
> > Could people with ahc(4) SCSI controllers give the following diff a try
> > and report whether this causes any difference in behaviour? This diff
> > seem
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:21:04 -0800
> From: Chris Cappuccio
>
> Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote:
> > iirc there were some objections to it.
> >
>
> I don't see any other way to accommodate ports that require early
> start in the rc.d system other than to PUT THEM FIRST. Otherw
Si no puede ver este correo o algunas letras pequeqas click aqum
Este mensaje ha sido enviado siguiendo las normas y
procedimientos de la Ley N0 2849 3 que regula el uso del correo electrsnico
no
solicitado. Este mensaje ha sido remitido por GRUPO PANA a una base de
datos cuidadosamente sel
> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:14:41 +
> From: Miod Vallat
>
> Could people with ahc(4) SCSI controllers give the following diff a try
> and report whether this causes any difference in behaviour? This diff
> seems to do wonders on alpha, but I'd like reports from other platforms
> (such as i386,
13 matches
Mail list logo
