Resimleri gvremiyor musunuz? "Resimleri gvster"i segin ya da bu iletiyi
tarayD1cD1nD1zda gvr|nt|leyin.
Bilgilendirme e-postalarD1nD1 almak istemiyorsanD1z l|tfen tD1klayD1n.
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
D0nvn| Caddesi Teknik Han
No:38 G|m|E suyu-Taksim/D0stanbul
0 212 252 15 75
0530 773
> However it's possible to tune it a bit more, I suggest
> a simple diff below for inclusion into 5.1.
I'd prefer to do nothing for 5.1, and ship it as it is.
Hi,
As it became evident, ix is driven by Low Latency Interrupts
on 82599 to do all sorts of processing instead of the regular
Rx/Tx queue interrupts. LLI is an additional facility that
is aimed to do out of band signalling for certain conditions.
Therefore it has it's own interrupt moderation se
Antoine Jacoutot [ajacou...@bsdfrog.org] wrote:
> >
> > I don't see any other way to accommodate ports that require early start in
> > the rc.d system other than to PUT THEM FIRST. Otherwise, rc.d scripts for
> > certain items need to be manually inserted into /etc/rc. How stupid is that
> > ?
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:21:04AM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote:
> > iirc there were some objections to it.
> >
>
> I don't see any other way to accommodate ports that require early start in
> the rc.d system other than to PUT THEM FIRST. Otherwis
Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote:
> iirc there were some objections to it.
>
I don't see any other way to accommodate ports that require early start in the
rc.d system other than to PUT THEM FIRST. Otherwise, rc.d scripts for certain
items need to be manually inserted into /etc/rc.
iirc there were some objections to it.
On 2012/02/10 11:14, Peter Bisroev wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 14:16, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > Peter Bisroev [pe...@int19h.net] wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you for a quick response guys! Chris if you are talking about
> >> modifying /etc/rc does that mean t
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 14:16, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Peter Bisroev [pe...@int19h.net] wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for a quick response guys! Chris if you are talking about
>> modifying /etc/rc does that mean that there could be a plan in the
>> future to add that to the CVS? In the interim, should I
Hello,
This patch adds support for the Intel Atom D-2700 processor. The patch
is originally from Jonathan Gray (jsg[ at ]jsg.id.au), tested by me.
Patch:
Index: sys/arch/i386/i386/machdep.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/i386/i386/m
