Re: Only noise from azalia

2012-01-20 Thread Jairo Souto
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:41:03AM -0200, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:24:19PM -0200, Jairo Souto wrote: > > > > I have been tried all bsd.mp from > > ftp.openbsd.org:/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/bsd.mp > > Are you running 4.9 or -current? 4.9 > > > misc@ did not ans

Message queue identifiers are broken

2012-01-20 Thread Alexis Fouilhe
Hi list, It seems that revision 1.22 of sys/kern/sysv_msg.c broke the message queues implementation. The most visible effect of this is msgget(2) always returning 0 on success. You will find below a program which gives the following evidence: - msgget(IPC_PRIVATE, ...) always returns 0 (see ipc

Re: fix ral (and maybe other cards) hostap mode

2012-01-20 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:57:54PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 10:23, Edd Barrett wrote: > > I will be willing to test any diffs relating to this. I have some soekris > > with Ral cards which i intended to use in hostap mode. > > Hi, > > I think finally we have a solution for this :) >

Re: fix ral (and maybe other cards) hostap mode

2012-01-20 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 10:23, Edd Barrett wrote: > I will be willing to test any diffs relating to this. I have some soekris > with Ral cards which i intended to use in hostap mode. Hi, I think finally we have a solution for this :) First you'll need to apply the two recent CVS commits by Stefan Sperling, ieee8021

Re: Scheduler improvements

2012-01-20 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:06:08PM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote: > > * Timeslices are 20ms long instead of 10ms. This solves the issue of 0ms > > long timeslices on machines with hz < 100. > > I'm not really happy having timeslices get larger. They're considerably > large already. Can you

Re: Scheduler improvements

2012-01-20 Thread Ariane van der Steldt
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 04:41:35PM +0100, Gregor Best wrote: > after a long time of silence here's a second iteration of the patch. > I've addressed a few concerns voiced here: > > * Process lookup and friends now have O(log n) runtime. I achieved that > by abusing RB-trees as priority queues si

Re: small change to the scandir(3) manual page

2012-01-20 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:33:29PM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:34:51PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote: > > - "builds an array of pointers to variable-size directory entries using > > malloc(3)" > > ^ Something like this could work. Perhaps also a note that we do this becaus

Re: ix(4) driver Bugfix

2012-01-20 Thread Mike Belopuhov
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hi! > > the ix(4)-Driver stores a pointer to the pci_attach_args structure (as > passed to ixgbe_attach) in its softc. However, the pci_attach_args > structure lives on the stack somewhere in autoconf, i.e. its contents are > undefined a

İngilizceyi öğrenmeyi ihmal etmeyin .

2012-01-20 Thread Sevgi KILIÇ
Kanada Kultur Merkezi Zorla ingilizce C6DYreneceksiniz. Ozel Ders Ortamindan Sizde Yararlanin. Yeni Donem Kayitlarimiz Basladi ( Ozel Ders Ortamimiz sizi bekliyor) Indirimli kayit donemi basladi hemen kayit yaptirin erken kayit avantajlarindan faydalanarak ozel ders or

ix(4) driver Bugfix

2012-01-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi! the ix(4)-Driver stores a pointer to the pci_attach_args structure (as passed to ixgbe_attach) in its softc. However, the pci_attach_args structure lives on the stack somewhere in autoconf, i.e. its contents are undefined after ixgbe_attach returns. However, the pointer to that data remains i

Re: small change to the scandir(3) manual page

2012-01-20 Thread Edd Barrett
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:34:51PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote: > - "builds an array of pointers to variable-size directory entries using > malloc(3)" ^ Something like this could work. Perhaps also a note that we do this because POSIX says so. -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.c

Re: small change to the scandir(3) manual page

2012-01-20 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:17:02AM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Edd Barrett wrote: > > I recently got caught out by scandir's quirky memory allocation. Should > > we add a note so that others don't have to go through this pain too? > > Could you elaborate on ho

Re: diff: ignore mandatory rx-connect-speed avp

2012-01-20 Thread Giovanni Bechis
On 01/20/12 11:11, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > On Friday, January 20, 2012 08:09 CET, YASUOKA Masahiko > wrote: > >> add handling of `rx connect speed' avp to ignore the bug of xl2tpd. >> reported by sebastia@ on misc@. >> The diff seems correct, ok giovanni@ Cheers Giovanni

FIX: filedescriptor leak in vi

2012-01-20 Thread Jan Klemkow
Hello, this diff fixes a filedescriptor leak in vi. I compiled the code but I could not test the code path. bye, Jan Index: recover.c === RCS file: /mount/cvsdev/cvs/openbsd/src/usr.bin/vi/common/recover.c,v retrieving revision 1.1

Re: fix ral (and maybe other cards) hostap mode

2012-01-20 Thread Edd Barrett
I will be willing to test any diffs relating to this. I have some soekris with Ral cards which i intended to use in hostap mode. Cheers On Jan 16, 2012 12:13 PM, "Steven Chamberlain" wrote: > On 16/01/12 09:47, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > this is a followup on the misc@ "problem with ral in

Re: diff: ignore mandatory rx-connect-speed avp

2012-01-20 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Friday, January 20, 2012 08:09 CET, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote: > add handling of `rx connect speed' avp to ignore the bug of xl2tpd. > reported by sebastia@ on misc@. > > ok? this works well for me now. OK. FWIW, I also opened a bug on the xl2tpd bug tracer regarding this issue. Sebastian

Re: calendar in Debian

2012-01-20 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:38:35AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 09:41:08PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > With a hint from Paul Jantzen I did test this a bit further. There's > > > > That is, Paul Janzen, sorry about that. > > > > > code to avoid having a child runi

Re: calendar in Debian

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 09:41:08PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > With a hint from Paul Jantzen I did test this a bit further. There's > > That is, Paul Janzen, sorry about that. > > > code to avoid having a child runing too long. If you have 20s > > patience, you'll see this: > > > > calendar

Re: calendar in Debian

2012-01-20 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:30:01AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 09:38:06PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > With a hint from Paul Jantzen I did test this a bit further. There's > > code to avoid having a child runing too long. If you have 20s > > patience, you'll see this

Re: calendar in Debian

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 09:38:06PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > With a hint from Paul Jantzen I did test this a bit further. There's > code to avoid having a child runing too long. If you have 20s > patience, you'll see this: > > calendar: uid 1000 did not finish in time Now that's interesting.

Re: calendar in Debian

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 05:46:48PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Introducing a race is never the right solution, imo. That I totally agree with. > By the way, your fix does not catch an included file being a fifo > either. So while introducing a race, it actually does not fix the > problem. Goo