On 12/19/11 19:33, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
this is an improved diff that addresses the problem with forced
unmount of the ntfs filesystem in situations like the one described
here: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=132257956328474&w=2
ntfs keeps a bunch of vnodes opened and marked as VSYSTEM inc
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 01:33:37AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> this is an improved diff that addresses the problem with forced
> unmount of the ntfs filesystem in situations like the one described
> here: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=132257956328474&w=2
>
> ntfs keeps a bunch of vnodes o
It seems to work, I'm not really sure if any laptops used rhine, but this
makes ACPI suspend/resume work on one of my early ACPI-capable systems.
Tested on:
vr0 at pci0 dev 12 function 0 "VIA VT6105 RhineIII" rev 0x86: apic 2 int 19,
address 00:19:5b:82:a1:e0
-Bryan.
Index: if_vr.c
===
this is an improved diff that addresses the problem with forced
unmount of the ntfs filesystem in situations like the one described
here: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=132257956328474&w=2
ntfs keeps a bunch of vnodes opened and marked as VSYSTEM including
the mount point: it's usecount is 1
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 21:46 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 18:50 -0800, James A. Peltier wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > | Hi All,
> > |
> > | Today is our semester maintenance day and we've upgraded our backup
> > | bridge firewall to the Dec. 15, 2011 snapsh
i've decided to rewrite the description to faciliate the review
process.
currently icmp6->icmp translation fails because of the incorrect
"icmp direction" check in pf_icmp_state_lookup. first of all it
checks all icmp packets except for the "echo reply". the reasons
for this are unknown. it wor
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 18:50 -0800, James A. Peltier wrote:
> - Original Message -
> | Hi All,
> |
> | Today is our semester maintenance day and we've upgraded our backup
> | bridge firewall to the Dec. 15, 2011 snapshot available from
> | ftp.openbsd.org and I'm getting this odd error wh
got an ok from henning, anyone else cares to comment?
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 00:40 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> updating regress tests, i've noticed that some of the optimizer
> tests are failing with additional (unoptimized) rules popping out.
> digging deeper has shown that is indeed a bug in
table{border:1px solid #99;border-collapse:collapse;}table
td{text-align:center;border:1px solid #99;}
P"P PPP P PP!P/P&P
+ P=P>P2P0Q QP>QP:P0 P2Q P4P0QP8 P7P0P:P0P7P>P2
PP5P:P0P1QQ 2011
Verke Auto GmbH P8PP?Q Q P=P0 QQ P
