> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 18:08:02 +0100
> From: Mike Belopuhov
>
> we don't do intel i/oat and don't set up parameters for the
> tcp timer interrupts, therefore there's no reason we should
> enable the interrupt itself.
>
> ok?
Defenitely! ok kettenis@
> diff --git dev/pci/ixgbe_type.h dev/pc
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Aaron Stellman wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> Is there any good reason why most of .c files need to have externs for
> ServerOptions/Options? Any reason not to have them in appropriate header
> files?
>
hi,
patches for portable openssh should go to the portable openssh
Hello there,
Is there any good reason why most of .c files need to have externs for
ServerOptions/Options? Any reason not to have them in appropriate header
files?
Index: auth-chall.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/openssh/auth-chall.c,v
retriev
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 17:46 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> there are some m_freem's missing in the error code paths.
> i guess that's because freebsd code is a bit different
> and we didn't look closely at it.
>
> ok?
>
> @@ -2601,6 +2604,8 @@ no_split:
> error = bus_dmamap_load_mbuf(rxr-
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 15:02 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> hi,
>
> i've spent a week trying to fix performance regression in ix(4)
> since the introduction of the new driver and this is where i'm
> right now. with the following change machine is able to sustain
> 760kpps and reach 9Gbit/s of fo
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:26 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:43:38PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> >> shaves off some bus read/write operations.
> >> tested on 82598 and 82599. ok?
> >
> > On what information is
we don't do intel i/oat and don't set up parameters for the
tcp timer interrupts, therefore there's no reason we should
enable the interrupt itself.
ok?
diff --git dev/pci/ixgbe_type.h dev/pci/ixgbe_type.h
index 601c6d5..b59 100644
--- dev/pci/ixgbe_type.h
+++ dev/pci/ixgbe_type.h
@@ -1318,7
we need to always schedule another rx ring refill callout
in case we fail to do it at the spot. previously what would
happen is that say we have 2 clusters on the rx ring and we
schedule an rxrefill callout that fails to update the ring.
then we still have those 2 clusters around. under heavy
loa
there are some m_freem's missing in the error code paths.
i guess that's because freebsd code is a bit different
and we didn't look closely at it.
ok?
diff --git dev/pci/if_ix.c dev/pci/if_ix.c
index 4468401..8ab83f8 100644
--- dev/pci/if_ix.c
+++ dev/pci/if_ix.c
@@ -2547,7 +2547,7 @@ ixgbe_get_b
Hi,
We would like to see you in Escort Girl Guide directory.
Please visit http://escortsagency.ch to review our directory.
Registration is fast and easy: http://escortsagency.ch/register.html
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.
Best Regards
Escorts Agency Team
UN
10 matches
Mail list logo