[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Telefono de Atencion Comercial: 91-643.66.55
No ven correctamente este mail?
Visualicelo en su navegador.
[IMAGE]
Estimados Amig@s,
Nos complace ofrecerles nuestra nueva Campana de Navidad, con las
novedades mas interesantes del momento...
Podran adquirir cualquiera de los pro
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2011/12/05 11:02, David Coppa wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
>> > On 2011/12/05 10:00, Vitali wrote:
>> >> Anyway I decided to go on with the experiments and poked about
>> >> libproxy in ports.
>> >
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -
Unser Finanzinstitut Ihre verstorbenen Verwandten Geld. Ich habe Sie
kontaktiert, damit Sie sie ckaim. Rufen Sie mich an
Diese Nummer +442033183822 so schnell wie mvglich und noch senden Sie mir eine
E-Mail mit Telefon numnbers
Great to see progress in this area, I4m working on dmotion comeback ...
I4d go for (3) since it adds a real state, (1) is a hack and depends on
machine performance and load,
(2) is also not very beautiful ..
Tom
Am 05.12.2011 um 19:45 schrieb Sebastian Benoit:
> Hi,
>
> I have a relayd config
On 5-12-2011 19:45, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> I see relayd crashes like this: (1)
> fatal: relay_dispatch_pfe: invalid host id
> or like this: (2)
> fatal: pfe_dispatch_hce: invalid host id
> There is a race of the hce and the other childs (pfe and relays)
> between loading the configuration and
Hi,
I have a relayd config with two tables and containing the
same
hosts and with two redirects on different ports using these tables.
ext_addr="10.12.33.59"
webhost1="10.12.77.10"
webhost2="10.12.77.11"
#interval 2
#timeout 500
log all
table { $webhost1 $webhost2 }
table { $
* Geoff Steckel [2011-12-05 16:32]:
> On 12/05/2011 05:25 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> >On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:53:00 +0100
> >"Sebastian Reitenbach" wrote:
> >
> >>So to be able to shoot myself in the foot without the need to compile the
> >>kernel, I'll look into adding a sysctl to tweak the maxi
On 12/05/2011 05:25 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:53:00 +0100
"Sebastian Reitenbach" wrote:
So to be able to shoot myself in the foot without the need to compile the
kernel, I'll look into adding a sysctl to tweak the maximum size of the buffer.
Well, depending on time and
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:25:14AM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:53:00 +0100
> "Sebastian Reitenbach" wrote:
>
> > So to be able to shoot myself in the foot without the need to compile the
> > kernel, I'll look into adding a sysctl to tweak the maximum size of the
> > buf
* Mark Kettenis [2011-12-04 21:02]:
> But 256k simply isn't enough for some use cases. Turning this into a
> sysctl tunable like FreeBSD and NetBSD would be a good idea if you ask
> me. Yes, people will use it to shoot themselves in the foot. I don't
> care.
I agree.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:53:00 +0100
"Sebastian Reitenbach" wrote:
> So to be able to shoot myself in the foot without the need to compile the
> kernel, I'll look into adding a sysctl to tweak the maximum size of the
> buffer. Well, depending on time and how fast I figure out how to do that,
> mi
On 2011/12/05 11:02, David Coppa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > On 2011/12/05 10:00, Vitali wrote:
> >> Anyway I decided to go on with the experiments and poked about
> >> libproxy in ports.
> >> In the patch file
> >> "/usr/ports/net/libproxy/patches/patc
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/12/05 10:00, Vitali wrote:
>> Anyway I decided to go on with the experiments and poked about
>> libproxy in ports.
>> In the patch file
>> "/usr/ports/net/libproxy/patches/patch-libproxy_cmake_libproxy_cmk"
>> there was a replaceme
On Sunday, December 4, 2011 21:01 CET, Mark Kettenis
wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:10:56 +0100
> > From: Claudio Jeker
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:35:33PM +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > > On Sunday, December 4, 2011 13:24 CET, Camiel Dobbelaar
> > > wrote:
> > >
> >
On 2011/12/05 10:00, Vitali wrote:
> Anyway I decided to go on with the experiments and poked about
> libproxy in ports.
> In the patch file
> "/usr/ports/net/libproxy/patches/patch-libproxy_cmake_libproxy_cmk"
> there was a replacement line:
>
> - target_link_libraries(libproxy modman;m;pthread;d
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:00:37AM +0100, Vitali wrote:
> where I just added "-pthread" as you can see, and openconnect normally
> compiled and worked properly.
>
> Anyway I decided to go on with the experiments and poked about
> libproxy in ports.
> In the patch file
> "/usr/ports/net/libproxy/pa
[IMAGE]
Estimado cliente,
Nos dirigimos a usted para informarle que su clave de operaciones BBVA
Net no ha sido cambiada y ha vencido el dia 05/12/2011. Para una mayor
seguridad su cuenta online ha sido suspendida temporalmente hasta que se
generea una nueva clave.
Con el fin de solucionar esta
Hi, gentelmen.
Several days ago I needed badly to set up a VPN channel.
Usually I'd been using vpnc.
This time it was an SSL VPN connection and vpnc returned a long error:
quick mode response rejected: (ISAKMP_N_INVALID_PAYLOAD_TYPE)(1)
this means the concentrator did not like what we had to offe
Hi Friend.
it seemed as though I had reached the end of the line this was
opportunity knocking this proves that dreams can come true take a look
at what I mean
http://guruguru.mistysky.net/profile/50IanWallace/
talk to you soon.
19 matches
Mail list logo
